Obiettivi formativi
Political leadership in Europe
EU’s direction is led by identifiable individuals, by institutions acting through their won instruments, and by constellations of actors. This seminar treated leadership not as anecdotes about strong or failed characters but as often institutional as personal, as a variable than a constant and as ascribed rather than possessed. Circumstances, institutional and cultural settings, political constraints, ideological wishful thinking but also personal footprints.
This course is based on six leading questions:
1) Formative: What shapes traditional leadership styles ?
2) Institutional: How does the architecture of EU governance shapes political leadership in Europe, at home, and in the international arena?
3) Comparative: What distinguishes European leadership styles from presidential or executive models in other regions (e.g., the U.S.)?
4) Historical: Which national leaders most successfully influenced the direction of the EU despite constraints?
5) Normative: How can European lead democratically as a supranational political system?
6) Geopolitical: Can, and if yes when does Europe lead in the world?
Prerequisiti
Undergraduate degree in Political Sciences
Risultati di apprendimento attesi
By the end of the course students can:
• Knowledge: Explain the institutional architecture and decision-making of the European Union and distinguish personal, collective, institutional and configurational forms of leadership within it.
• Application: Analyse a leadership episode with the concepts of the course; design and conduct a semi-structured elite interview; use primary and secondary literature to analyse leadership in a supranational system vs. the US and the European national systems.
• Judgement: State explicit criteria for what counts as leadership and for judging it successful or failed; defend a counterfactual; distinguish evidence from rehearsed self-presentation or simply anecdotic narratives.
• Communication: Argue a case to an academic audience and to a decision-maker, and conduct a professional conversation with a senior interlocutor in English.
• Learning skills: Carry out a small qualitative research project from question to result, and identify what political science adds to a practical subject.
Contenuti Del Corso
Political leadership and the EU political system
Testi Di Riferimento
Fabbrini, S. (2007): Compound democracies. Why the United States and Europe are becoming similar. Oxford.
Northouse, P. G. (2025): Leadership: Theory and Practice. London.
Tömmel, I. / Verdun, A. (eds.) (2021): Political Leadership in the European Union. London: Routledge.
Rhodes, R.A.W. and ‘t Hart, P. (2014): The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford.
Weber, M. (1919): Politics as a Vocation. Munich.
Metodologie Didattiche
In-person teaching at LUISS in a two-day rhythm. Attendance is compulsory; absences require official documentation.
Thursday, lecture (19.30–21.00). The theoretical and substantive frame of the week: concepts, state of the research, institutional and historical context.
Friday, seminar (10.15–11.45). seminar discussion based on the key reading and selected case studies. Students presentations are welcomed.
Strasbourg (18.-21.01.2027) or Brussels (25.1.-27.1.2027). The field phase. Students prepare the discussions with EU members, officials, journalists and fonctionnaires. - with a daily group debrief and a written summary about an individual chosen question.
Modalità di verifica dell'apprendimento
Written midterm exam during the course (1/3 of final grade) and final oral exam at the end of the course (2/3 of final grade). For non-attending students, extended final oral exam at the end of the course (3/3 of final grade). Presentation by student teams organised weekly throughout the course for grade bonus up to 2 points.
Criteri per l’assegnazione dell’elaborato finale
Active participation during the course and final grade equal or greater than 28
Settimana 1
Introduction: studying political leadership in Europe
Lecture:
- Introduction to the course: aims, structure, requirements, assessment and the Brussels field phase
- What this course means by leadership: personal, collective, institutional and configurational forms
- Leadership as a variable rather than a constant, and as ascribed rather than possessed
- The six leading questions of the course and the state of the research field
Seminar:
- What counts as evidence for leadership? Discussion on historical examples
- What does journalists see as “leaderships”
- AI as a tool for political science + Ground rules for the use of AI in this course; first hands-on exercise on a short corpus of leaders' speeches
Settimana 2
Political leadership as a concept: from the classics to modern theory
Lecture:
- Classical thinking on leadership: Cicero, Machiavelli, Weber
- Introduction in the leadership
Seminar:
- Close reading of Weber, Politics as a Vocation
- Comparison with Cicero's and Machiavelli's thought
- Case studies on the basis of these texts, e.g. Caesar.
Key reading for the week:
Weber, M. (1919): Politics as a Vocation, Munich [complete text, any scholarly English edition].
Extended reading for the week:
Machiavelli, N. (1513): The Prince, chapters XV–XIX; and Discorsi I, 9.
Brown, A. (2014): The Myth of the Strong Leader. Political Leadership in the Modern Age, London, chapter 1: Putting Leadership in Context, pp. 25–61.
Burns, J.M. (1978): Leadership, New York, chapters 1 and 4 [transactional and transforming leadership].
Morstein-Marx, R. (2009): “Dignitas and res publica: Caesar and Republican Legitimacy”, in: Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die „letzte Generation“ der römischen Republik, Munich, pp. 115–140
Settimana 3
Political elites and the political class
Lecture:
- theory on political elite, political class and personalisation.
- Recruitment, selection and socialisation.
Seminar:
- Discussion of key reading.
- Case study, political class and elite in the EU supranational system.
Key reading for the week:
Krastev, Ivan (2017): After Europe. Philadelphia. Chapter2: Only the subchapter the Brussles paradox, pp.86-93.
Extended reading for the week:
Allen, Peter (2018): The political class. Oxford, Chapter 1 pp.19-42.
Best, H. and Higley, J. (2018): “Introduction”, in: Best, H. and Higley, J. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites, London
Borchert, J. and Zeiss, J. (eds.) (2003): The Political Class in Advanced Democracies, Oxford, Introduction.
Michels, R. (1911/1962): Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, New York, final part on the iron law of oligarchy.
Young, Michale (1994): The Rise of the meritocracy. London. Capter 4, pp. 69-90.
Settimana 4
The EU as a setting for leadership: a conceptual session
Lecture:
- Compound democracy (Fabbrini) and the comparison with the US presidential model
- What the EU's architecture does to leadership:
-
Seminar:
- Close work on the Tömmel/Verdun special issue of the Journal of European Integration: each student team takes one article and all read the introduction. (Delors; Commission presidents; roaming regulation; Van Rompuy; the standing president of the European Council; the European Parliament; the ECB; Merkel and Tsipras;)
after the questions: which concept of leadership is used, on which evidence, and what exactly is claimed?
Key reading for the week:
Tömmel, I. and Verdun, A. (2017): “Political leadership in the European Union: an introduction”, Journal of European Integration 39 (2), pp. 103–112 [reprinted in Tömmel, I. and Verdun, A. (eds.), Political Leadership in the European Union, London].
Extended reading for the week:
Tömmel, I. (2013): “The Presidents of the European Commission: Transactional or Transforming Leadership?”, Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (4), pp. 789–805.
Van Esch, F. (2017): “The paradoxes of legitimate EU leadership. An analysis of the multi-level leadership of Angela Merkel and Alexis Tsipras during the euro crisis”, Journal of European Integration 39 (2), pp. 223–237.
Müller, H. (2017): “Setting Europe's agenda: the Commission presidents and political leadership”, Journal of European Integration 39 (2), pp. 129–142.
Fabbrini, S. (2007): Compound Democracies. Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar, Oxford, chapter 1.
Settimana 5
Historical period I: founding leadership, 1945–1957
Lecture:
- The founders as leaders: Monnet, Schuman, Adenauer, De Gasperi, Spaak – vision, transnational networks and confessional milieu
- What kind of leadership shaped the Schuman Plan, the ECSC, the failure of the EDC, the Rome Treaties?
Seminar:
- The Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950 as a primary source: who drafted it, what does it commit to, what does it deliberately leave open?
- Case: the failure of the European Defence Community in 1954 – leadership that did not work
- Seminar discussion: What would have happened without Monnet?
Key reading for the week:
Milward, A.S. (1992/2000): The European Rescue of the Nation-State, London, chapter 1 and the chapter on the Schuman Plan.
Extended reading for the week:
Duchêne, F. (1994): Jean Monnet. The First Statesman of Interdependence, New York, chapters on the Schuman Plan and the EDC.
Kaiser, W. (2007): Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union, Cambridge, chapters on the transnational networks of the founding period.
Gilbert, M. (2012): European Integration. A Concise History, Lanham, chapters 1–2.
Primary source: Schuman Declaration, Paris, 9 May 1950.
Settimana 6
Guest lecture and mid-term examination
Thursday – guest lecture:
- Leadership in praxis
Friday – mid-term written examination:
- 60 minutes, covering weeks 1–5:
(The order of the two sessions may be reversed depending on the availability of the guest)
Key reading:
Kissinger, H. (2022): Leadership. Six Studies in World Strategy, New York, Conclusion, pp. 395–416
Settimana 7
Historical period II: national leaders, the single market and Maastricht, 1979–1992
Lecture:
- The relaunch of integration: the single market programme, the Delors Commission, the Franco-German engine
- Kohl, Mitterrand, Delors and Thatcher: four answers to the question what Europe is for and what can be promised abroad and deliver at home
Seminar:
- Two speeches from one year: Thatcher in Bruges and Delors before the TUC, both 1988
- Case: the road to Maastricht – how was monetary union decided, and who led?
- Debate: was Delors an entrepreneur or a bookkeeper of member state preferences?
Key reading for the week:
Moravcsik, A. (1998): The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, chapter 1 and the chapter on Maastricht.
Extended reading for the week:
Ross, G. (1995): Jacques Delors and European Integration, Cambridge, chapters 1–2.
Bulmer, S. and Paterson, W.E. (2019): Germany and the European Union. Europe's Reluctant Hegemon?, London, chapter on the Kohl era.
Primary source: Thatcher, M., Speech to the College of Europe (“The Bruges Speech”), 20 September 1988.
Settimana 8
Historical period III: leadership in crisis, 2008–2021
Lecture:
- the euro crisis, migration in 2015, Brexit, Covid-19: The crisis leadership tasks
Seminar:
- Cases: Merkel and Draghi – a comparison
- Debate: was Next Generation EU a Hamiltonian moment or a deadline effect?
Key reading for the week:
Boin, A., 't Hart, P., Stern, E. and Sundelius, B. (2016): The Politics of Crisis Management. Public Leadership under Pressure, 2nd edition, Cambridge, chapters 1–2.
Extended reading for the week:
Schimmelfennig, F. (2015): “Liberal intergovernmentalism and the euro area crisis”, Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2), pp. 177–195.
Ferrera, M., Miró, J. and Ronchi, S. (2021): “Walking the road together? EU polity maintenance during the COVID-19 crisis”, West European Politics 44 (5–6), pp. 1329–1352.
Settimana 9
Contemporary leadership: between crisis and epochal change
Lecture:
- Personalised leadership as an answer to disorientation: Orbán, Meloni, Macron a leadership offer without sufficient following?
- Technocrats as leadership resource
Seminar:
Guest lecture by Federico Fubini, leading journalist at Corriere Della Sera
Extended readings from Fubini's newspaper articles here:
https://www.corriere.it/firme/federico-fubini
Settimana 10
Leadership psychology and leadership toolkit
Lecture: leadership psychology
Seminar: leadership toolkit
- Speech writing
Key reading for the week:
Extended reading for the week:
Charteris-Black, J. (2018): Analysing Political Speeches. Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor, 2nd edition, London, chapters 1–2.
Settimana 11
Guest lecture and empirical social research: qualitative interviews
Thursday – guest lecture:
Friday – seminar on empirical social research:
- From research question to design: what qualitative interviews can and cannot establish
- Types of interview and the expert interview as a distinct instrument; sampling, access, ethics and consent; recording, transcription, anonymity
- Validity problems specific to elites: rehearsed self-presentation, retrospective rationalisation, hindsight bias
- Analysis: coding, triangulation with documents, reporting
- Each team begins to draft its interview guide for the Strasbourg field phase; the guides are discussed and finalised in week 12
Key reading for the week:
Bogner, A., Littig, B. and Menz, W. (eds.) (2009): Interviewing Experts, Basingstoke, Introduction: Expert Interviews – An Introduction to a New Methodological Debate.
Extended reading for the week:
Berry, J.M. (2002): “Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing”, PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (4), pp. 679–682.
Mosley, L. (ed.) (2013): Interview Research in Political Science, Ithaca, Introduction and the chapter on elite interviewing in Washington, DC.
Settimana 12
Where does Europe lead? Climate policy, trade and defence compared
Lecture:
- When has Europe leadership capcities
Seminar:
- Exam preperation
- Discussion of the interview guides: each team presents its questionnaire, joint critique against the criteria of week 11, final revision before Strasbourg + preparation of the Strasbourg field phase
Key reading for the week:
Bradford, A. (2020): The Brussels Effect. How the European Union Rules the World, Oxford, chapters 1.