INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL THEORY
Instructional goals
The course introduces the recent debate within normative International Political Theory, by focusing on some basic moral claims, conflicts and dilemmas that arise in the global context. A series of facts characterize the international world: the existence of states, which lay claim to territories and exercise coercive power; such states protect, but also violate, human rights; conflicts, including armed conflicts, arise between states, and between groups within and across states; migration flows (re-)shape the relations among states. This course will be trying to explain our moral reactions to these facts, and the duties and claims of justice that we think states, groups, and individuals have with respect to one another in the various contexts that these facts create. Students will be confronted with a variety (sometimes conflicting) of influential contributions by prominent political philosophers, with the aim of encouraging them to both adopt a critical approach and develop an analytical attitude when considering contemporary global issues. Broadly, the course aims to provide students with: • knowledge of the main dilemmas and arguments that have featured in contemporary ethical debates in the above-mentioned areas; • understanding of the philosophical theories behind those dilemmas and arguments; • an improved ability to make clear and informed ethical assessments of the political and legal scenarios and decisions studied in other, less normatively oriented courses; • an improved ability to engage in philosophical debates with efficacy and clarity.
Intended learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding:
By the end of the course, students will acquire:
• Better knowledge of the main texts and dilemmas emerged in the scholarly debate on International Political Theory
• Improved understanding of different approaches and competing perspectives on international/global justice (e.g.: cosmopolitan vs statist views; global egalitarianism vs minimalism; utilitarianism vs deontological approaches etc.)
• Increased capacity to engage critically with the readings and the literature in the field and to connect a normative thinking about these problems to other, either empirical or juridical, perspectives.
Increased capacity to make ethical assessment of relevant facts in international affairs
Applying knowledge and understanding:
Students will be able to apply their acquired knowledge in their future professional activities, in several ways. In particular, students will be trained in:
• Drafting and preparing policy briefs aimed at policy makers and /or advocacy
• Carrying out research (either academic or for professional purposes) in the field of world poverty, social justice, social inclusion, migration, etc.
• Giving public talks, formulating objections, etc.
Making judgements:
Due to critical approach employed in the course and the emphasis placed on autonomous re-elaboration and critical discussion of the readings, students will be able to:
• Provide informed ethical assessments of the evolving international political scenarios;
• Develop an autonomous and critical judgement view about facts of the international world, which can be employed in several professional sectors
• Carry out a research work, which includes the capacity to collect material, engage with readings autonomously and present an independent point of view
Communication Skills:
During the course students will be asked to contribute to the discussion in several ways, via critiques and active engagement in class discussion. Students are therefore expected to improve their communication skills especially via the “critique sessions” and the overall degree and quality of participation in class discussions.
Critique sessions: One meeting each week sees 4 (or even more, depending on the number of attending students enrolled in the course) students (individually) actively involved in the discussion. Students are asked to present a specific critique/response regarding the topic of the day and stimulate class discussion.
Learning skills:
By the end of the course students are expected to acquire the following skills:
• Better capacity to design, draft and autonomously carry out research work
• Improved ability to make intelligent use of informed ethical assessment to apply to the evolving international political scenario
• Increased competence in providing well-organized and clear arguments in support of their views
• Increased expertise in debating about important facts that characterize our international world.
Course Contents
The course will confront students with a series of pressing questions, which include – albeit, it is not limited to - the following:
•What duties, if any, are owed by richer nations to poorer nations? Is justice within a state different from justice between states?
•Under what conditions states can be thought to have a just claim to resources that are within their borders? Should countries have a duty to open their borders to immigration flows?
•How does the concept of justice bear on cases of violent conflict? Do combatants, and terrorists differ in their degrees of moral immunity to attack?
•What is the aim of transitional justice?
The course will be therefore organized around the following units:
Introduction to International Political Theory;
Unit 1: World Poverty and A global duty to aid?
Unit 2: Just Economic Relations among Peoples and a Duty of Assistance
Unit 3: Global Egalitarianism Restated: Reforming the Global Economic Order
Unit 4: Clean Global Trade
Unit 5: Human rights in the real-world
Unit 6: The ethics of borders
Unit 7: Just Europe
Unit 8: JWT and Humanitarian Intervention
Unit 9: JWT and Terrorism
Unit 10: Transitional Justice
Unit 11: The Wrongs of Colonialism
Reference Books
REQUIRED READINGS
Brown C. and Eckersley R. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory (Oxford, 2018) - chapters :
-Chris Brown and Robyn Eckersley, “International Political Theory and the Real World”, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.52
-Darrel Moellendorf, “Real-World Global Egalitarianism”, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.7
- Susanne Buckley-Zistel, "Transitional Justice", Doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.10
- Armstrong, C. (2012). Global Distributive Justice, An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
- Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press- part 1 and 2.
Additional readings are included in the syllabus.
Teaching Methods
The course will comprise a mixture of lectures and seminars.
Lectures:
The initial lectures will provide groundwork and basic conceptual tools as well as introduce specific topics addressed in the seminars.
Seminars:
The seminar style meetings will see groups of four (or more according to the number of actually attendant students) students present a secondary reading related to the weekly topic. The students in the presenting group will be required to write a critique of/response to the required reading. This exercise should be open-ended and serve as a jumping off point for debate.
Assessment Method
The assessment for this course is seen as a process rather than one or a collection of different methods. It responds to the need of embedding the overall evaluation within the learning process. Thus, a portion of the assessment will be connected to in-class activities and to the level of students’ involvement in and response to such various activities. The overal assement for the course will be determined on the basis of 4 components: • Class debates in the seminar portion • Attendance rate • Mid-Term assignment • Final Exam. For those who are not compliant with the attending rules the final examination will be based on a final exam which entails both oral and written components
Thesis assignment criteria
Final Grade (above 28/30)
Week 1
Introduction to IPT
-Intro to the course. What is International Political Theory? -Description of the Syllabus
Required readings:
- Chris Brown and Robyn Eckersley, “International Political Theory and the Real World”, Oxford Handbook to International Political Theory, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.52
- Terry Nardin, International political theory and the question of justice, International Affairs, Volume 82, Issue 3, May 2006, Pages 449–465,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.
Week 2
Unit 1: World Poverty and a Universal Duty to Aid
- Lecture: Is there a moral duty to aid?
Required reading:
-Peter Singer “Famine, Affluence and Morality” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 1 (Spring 1972), pp. 229-243
- class discussion on “the case for aid in Africa” effectiveness and need for reform
- Further Material (to be read and discussed during class time):
Dambisa Moyo, Why foreign aid is hurting Africa,
Week 3
Unit 2: Just Economic Relations among Peoples and a Duty of Assistance
Lecture: Just Economic Relations and Duty of Assistance
Required Readings:
- Martin, Rex (2015) Rawls on International Economic Justice in The Law of Peoples. Journal of Business Ethics 127, 743–759 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2184-x
Class discussion on the causes of poverty and international responsibilities: Operationalising the duty of assistance
- Further Material (to be read and discussed during class time):
We need a Marshall plan for Africa https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/21/we-need-a-marshall-plan-for-africa
Week 4
Unit 3: Reforming the Global Economic Order
Lecture: Global Egalitarianism Restated
Required readings:
-Darrel Moellendorf, “Real-World Global Egalitarianism”, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.7
-Global Distributive Justice, CH 2
Class discussion on global reform, debating the Global Tax
Tobin, James. “A Proposal for International Monetary Reform.” Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 4, no. 3/4, 1978, pp. 153–59, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20642317.
Further Material (to be read and discussed during class time):
- Ministers of Germany, Brazil, South Africa and Spain: why we need a global tax on billionaires, The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2024/apr/25/ministers-of-germany-brazil-south-africa-and-spain-why-we-need-a-global-tax-on-billionaires
- Brock, G. (2011). Reforms to global taxation and accounting arrangements as a means of pursuing global justice. Global Social Policy, 11(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018110392195a
Week 5
Unit 4: Clean Global Trade
Lecture: Property rights and Resource Curse
Required Readings:
- Wenar, L. (2008), Property Rights and the Resource Curse. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36: 2-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00122.x
Class discussion on Multinational corporations and third world resources
Further Material to be read and discussed during class time):
- Why Multinational Resource Owners Incite Social Dissent, https://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2017/08/31/why-multinational-resource-owners-incite-soc
Week 6
Unit 5: Human Rights Regime in Real-world
Lecture - Minimalism about Human Rights
Required Readings:
-Cohen, J. (2004), Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For? Journal of Political Philosophy, 12: 190-213. http://doi:10.1111/j.14679760.2004.00197.x
Class discussion on toleration and human rights in real world
Further Material (to be read and discussed during class time):
The Global Civilisation Initiative: Are ‘Asian Values’ Back with a Chinese Vengeance?, https://fulcrum.sg/the-global-civilisation-initiative-are-asian-values-back-with-a-chinese-vengeance/
Midterm October 16: short in class essay (800 words). 25% final grade
Week 7
Unit 6: The Ethics of Borders
Justice in Migration
Required Readings:
- Lea Ypi: Justice in Migration: A Closed Borders Utopia? The Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 16 Number 4, 2008, pp. 391–418.
Class presentation and discussion on the status of refugees
Further Material:
- Kukhatas, Chandran. (2016). Are refugees special?. In Migration in political theory: The ethics of movement and membership (pp. 249-268). Oxford University Press.
- Gibney, MJ. The ethics of refugees. Philosophy Compass. 2018; 13:e 12521. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12521
Week 8
Unit 7: Just Europe
Just Europe
Required Readings:
-Van Parijs, P. (2019), Just Europe. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 47: 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12133
Presentation and Class debates: EU’s citizens’ rights
Further Material:
- Richard Bellamy & Joseph Lacey (2018) Balancing the rights and duties of European and national citizens: a demoicratic approach, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:10, 1403-1421, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488885
- Efthymiou, D.E. EU Citizens’ Access to Welfare Rights: How (not) to Think About Unreasonable Burdens?. Res Publica (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-095
Week 9
Unit 8: Just War Theory and Humanitarian Intervention
Lecture: Just War and Humanitarian Intervention
Required Readings:
Rex Martin. (2005), Just Wars and Humanitarian Interventions. Journal of Social Philosophy, 36: 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00287.x.
Seminar and class discussion on “The morality of humanitarian interventions”
Further Material:
-Buchanan, Allen. "From Nuremburg to Kosovo: The morality of illegal international legal reform." Ethics 111.4 (2001): 673-705.
-Pattison, J. (2011). The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(3), 271-277. doi:10.1017/S0892679411000256.
Week 10
Unit 9: Just War Theory & Terrorism
Lecture: Just war theory, legitimate authority, terrorist groups
Required Reading:
-Held, V. (2005), Legitimate Authority in Non‐state Groups Using Violence. Journal of Social Philosophy, 36: 175-193. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00
Presentations and class discussion on “Just war theory and terrorism”.
Further Material:
- Talal Asad (2010) Thinking about terrorism and just war, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23:1, 3-24, DOI: 10.1080/09557570902956580ù
- Walzer, M. Terrorism and Just War. Philosophia 34, 3–12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-006-9004-
Week 11
Unit 10: Transitional Justice
Minimalism about Transitional Justice
Required Readings:
- Gentile V. & Foster M. 2021, “Towards a minimal conception of transitional justice”, International Theory.
Presentations and class discussion on Transitional Justice, normative foundations and its limits
Further Materials:
- Ruti Teitel, Rethinking Jus Post Bellum in an Age of Global Transitional Justice: Engaging with Michael Walzer and Larry May, European Journal of International Law 24 (2013), 335–342.
- Makau Mutua, What Is the Future of Transitional Justice?, International Journal of Transitional Justice, Volume 9, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/iju032
Week 12
Unit 11: The Wrongs of Colonialism
Lecture: The Wrongs of Colonialism
Required Readings:
Bufacchi, V. (2017), Colonialism, Injustice, and Arbitrariness. Journal of Social Philosophy, 48: 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12182
Presentation and class discussion on colonialism
Further Material:
- YPI, L. (2013), What's Wrong with Colonialism. Philos Public Aff, 41: 158-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12014.
- Moore, M. (2019), The Taking of Territory and the Wrongs of Colonialism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 27: 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp