COMPARATIVE PUBLIC POLICY IN EUROPE

COMPARATIVE PUBLIC POLICY IN EUROPE

Mark Thatcher

Instructional goals

The course aims at providing the students with a wide knowledge of major public policies pursued at the EU and national levels. For the different policies, the course will analyse the key institutional structures and policies pursued, as well as changes in these, comparing across polities and over time. The course will also analyse how different national systems adapt to supranational and international developments.

Intended learning outcomes

Knowledge and understanding: The course will offer key theoretical tools to compare public policies. This course provides advanced knowledge and analytical resources that will enable students to understand the processes, content and consequences of different policies across countries, their similarities and differences in the context of European and international developments. Applying knowledge and understanding: The students will be able to: •apply institutionalist models to cross-national comparative case studies of policy making such as economic policy, alteration of governance structures and Europeanisation; •examine major public policies through comparing across countries in Europe as well as the EU level •look at how institutions shape, constrain and enable policy making, including policy change and inertia Making judgements: We expect students to be able to analyze public policy and governance models to demonstrate an indepth, critical understanding of the scope and challenges of public policies. They are expected to be able to discuss and evaluate key policy initiatives and development in the EU and its member states. Throughout the whole course, students will be invited to critically analyse when, how and why certain policies are pursued. Communications Skills: This course will give the students the possibility to acquire and understand major terms and concepts in order to communicate their ideas, proposals, analysis and critical reasoning in the field of public policy in the most effective and appropriate way. Learning skills: This course will contribute to empower learners giving them the tools to determine why certain public policies are followed and others are not and to evaluate explanatory the models in an independent way.

Course Contents

The course focuses on the reality of several public policies in several European countries, offering information about the current discussion in the literature on public policy analysis at different levels of government (European, national, regional and local) and its mutual relationships and interactions. It looks at their types, dynamics, external and internal determinants, change and reform, outcomes and its changing contents in issues like economic, social or environmental policies across several countries. Major issues will include ‘rationality’ in public policy making, why policies are changed or persist and the interactions between the EU and national levels of policy making.

Reference Books

Dodds, A (2nd ed 2018), Comparative Public Policy (Macmillan) Schmidt, VA and Thatcher, M (eds) (2013), Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) Most readings are available via LUISS on-line subscriptions. Other articles and papers in the syllabus will be uploaded on the course’s web page. For the full reading list, please see LuissLearn

Teaching Methods

Lectures and presentations on relevant empirical issues. Students’ participation during lectures is strongly encouraged and will be considered in the final assessment.

Assessment Method

The main exam is composed of six questions of an unseen exam, at the end of the course covering the whole course programme. Students attending the course (students who have participated and made the presentation) can take three exam questions that count for 75% and participation counts for 25%. Students not attending the course will have to answer 4 exam questions. Students who want to participate in class presentations must sign up for them in the first weeks of the course. Presentations can be done by one to four students in each class. Presentations assigned on the basis of one class topic will be presented to the class at the following class (e.g. the group task assigned in session 7 is to be presented at the beginning of session 8).

Thesis assignment criteria

28 or higher in this course and others; suitable topic and clear research question

Does the syllabus cover sustainability topics?

Not directly but links with regulation of energy

Week 1 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Introduction to the course and key concepts Different approaches to comparative public policy

Week 2 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Debate: Can the spread of neo-liberalism be explained just by the personal interests of politicians and large firms? 1 group for and 1 against Topic of lectures and debates: What is neo-liberalism and how does it differ from social democracy Key readings: Schmidt, VA and Thatcher, M (eds) (2013), Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)- chs 1 and 14 Jessop, B (2014): A specter is haunting Europe: a neoliberal phantasmagoria, Critical Policy Studies, DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2014.944368 Dodds, A (2nd ed 2018), Comparative Public Policy (Macmillan), ch 8 Further reading Crouch, C (2011), The Strange Non-Death of Neo-liberalism (Cambridge: Polity) ch 1 For brief discussions of key concepts, Matthew Eagleton-Pierce Neoliberalism: The Key Concepts, Routledge 2016

Week 3 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Student presentation of one reason for the resilience of neo-liberal ideas, comparing two countries, and then discussion and debate Topic of lectures and debate: State ownership, privatization and the spread of liberal institutions Debate: Has the spread of privatization in Europe been driven mainly by ideas? (one group for, and 2nd against)

Week 4 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Student presentation: privatization in one sector comparing two countries, and then discussion and debate Topic of lectures and debate: The regulatory state Debate: the regulatory state model is dominant in Europe today

Week 5 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Student presentation: taking one aspect of Majone’s ‘regulatory state’ and critically examine to what extent it has developed in two polities (ie countries in European or one country and the EU) , followed by discussion and debate Topic of lectures and debates: Delegation to non-majoritarian institutions and Independent Regulatory Agencies (IRAs) Debate: rational calculating politicians create IRAs

Week 6 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Student presentation comparing the creation of one major Independent regulatory authority in two countries, followed by discussion and debate Topic of lectures and discussion: Varieties of capitalism Debate: can countries maintain different varieties of capitalism in the face of globalisation? 1 group for and one against

Week 7 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

student presentation looking at the extent to which ONE polity fits the VoC typology, followed by discussion and debate Lecture- The spread of independent central banks No debate

Week 8 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

student presentation comparing the creation of two ICBs in different polities followed by discussion and debate Topic of lectures and debate: Industrial Policy Debate: Have European states lost the ability to undertake industrial policies? 1 group for and 1 against

Week 9 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Student presentation: compare public policies towards promoting former national champion in the same sector in 2 major European countries, followed by discussion and debate Topic of lectures and debate: Network industries and internationalization Debate: liberalization and privatisation have not stopped governments supporting former monopolists in network industries

Week 10 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Student presentation: compare policies towards aiding two major former monopolists to internationalize in the same network sector in two different countries, followed by discussion and debate Topic of lectures and debate Cultural Heritage policies in Europe

Week 11 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

Student presentation: Compare the development of legislation to protect historic buildings after 1945 in two European countries Lecture- reconsideration of neo-liberalism

Week 12 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus

-