Instructional goals
The Media Law Course displays a twofold, ambitious aim: first, to conceptualize ‘media’ as a legal domain and to offer an insight on the mainfold array of topics concerned; second, to give the student a insight in how ‘media’ interact with their daily behaviour. If the former aim is instrumental to the development of a career in any of the areas affected, the latter may wishfully result in a personal upgrading of one’s general self-awareness as a lawyer and as a citizen. In particular, classes focused on decisions, facilitating students in acquiring familiarity with vocabulary and practice useful for their perspective academic and professional careers.
Prerequisites
Knowledge of principles of constitutional law, private law and criminal law.
Intended learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding: the student – through participation in lectures and practical activities – will know the main categories of Media Law, also in the light of the supranational regulatory framework. Applying knowledge and understanding: The student, by learning the theory and the appropriate legal method, will be able to interpret and apply, also to cases, principles and concepts of Media Law. The student will be able to compare these principles with those established at the supranational level. At the end of the course, an oral exam will take place. Making judgements: The student, by making use of the appropriate methods learned during the course, will be able to collect data and materials to analyze the relevant provisions, case law as well as scholars’ approaches related to Media Law. The student will gain the ability to evaluate such data independently and to make critical judgements on their application to practical cases. Communication skills: At the end of the course the student will be able to use the legal and technical vocabulary of Media Law, addressing the legal issues at hand with terminological accuracy. Through the various activities that will take place during the course – lessons with discussion, oral exams, moot courts, workshops – the student will be able to put these communication skills into practice in various contexts, by adapting the terms used to the interlocutor in the specific case, thus gaining advanced rhetorical skills necessary for his/her professional career. Learning skills: the technical and legal knowledge gained during the course will allow the student to independently understand and interpret regulatory changes, new case law and scholars’ approaches related to Media Law. The student will develop a solid knowledge of the fundamental aspects of the matter that will allow him/her to carry on also independently further study as well as to undertake different postgraduate training activities.
Course Contents
The course is divided into two parts.
The first part, taught by prof. Esposito, is built around the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), examined both in its normative structure and through current cases and practical simulations.
The second part, taught by prof. Punzi, focuses on fundamental concepts of Media Law and on how freedom of expression through the media has been changing in recent years as a result of digitalization and the advent of artificial intelligence.
Reference Books
• European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) and Digital Services Act (DSA);
• Code of Practice on Disinformation;
• judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union, of the European Court of Human Rights and of national courts within the EU;
• slides mapping the relevant regulatory pathways, together with case studies.
Teaching Methods
Weekly structure
Wednesday. Theoretical presentation of the week’s topic, supported by slides and class discussion. The subject of the following session is announced, together with the preparation expected from students.
Thursday. Analysis of current cases, drawing on video material (for instance the Pegasus and Paragon affairs, Trump’s ban from social media, the removal of COVID-19 vaccine posts) or on simulations — such as «How would you draft a public-service broadcasting law that complies with the EMFA?» or «Sitting as the judge, how would you reason the lawfulness or unlawfulness of removing a post?» — reconstructed in the light of the EMFA or on the basis of other relevant national and supranational regulations and jurisprudential orientation.
Assessment Method
For Part I (taught by Prof. Esposito), assessment is by a group paper (groups of at most 4–5 students) on one of the themes addressed during the course:
• a) Media freedom and pluralism under the EMFA;
• b) Editorial independence under the EMFA;
• c) The privatization of censorship;
• d) Disinformation and democracy.
For Part II (taught by Prof. Punzi), assessment will proceed as follows.
Each student will be required to:
• Write a paper; orally present the paper during the workshop; enliven the discussion about the paper among their team colleagues; give a brief oral report summarizing the discussion that took place following their presentation. Grading breakdown: Paper on the chosen case: 20%; Presentation on that case + Debate + Report: 40%; Active participation in the discussion of other students’ presentations: 40%.
Thesis assignment criteria
'Law and Innovation' Track
Week 1
What is media? — Art. 2 EMFA
Topics. Introduction to and framing of the EMFA.
Focus. What the media are and how they work; the various types of media; the actors operating within them (journalists, managers, and others).
Method. Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCLzMRQYFZ0
Reading. P. Cesarini, G. De Gregorio, O. Pollicino, The Media Privilege in the European Media Freedom Act, Medialaws.
Week 2
Editorial independence and political influence — Art. 5 EMFA
Topics. Freedom of the press; Art. 5 EMFA.
Focus. The reform of RAI (the Italian public broadcaster).
Method. Group simulation in which the class jointly selects, for example, RAI’s Director-General and Board — exploring who appoints them (the government or the political parties?), and, if the parties, by what majority and under what voting procedure.
Reading. E. Albanesi, Safeguards for the independent functioning of public service media providers. The legal position of domestic legislation that is not in compliance with Article 5 EMFA, Rivista di informatica e diritto, no. 2/2024.
Week 3
Spyware and the media: the Pegasus case — Art. 4 EMFA
Topics. Art. 4(3)(c) EMFA; media freedom, media pluralism, and the function of the media.
Focus. Spyware — the Pegasus affair, and Paragon as a national case.
Method. Video: «Pegasus: the spyware technology that threatens democracy» (The Guardian), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7H9uo3j5FQ&t=154s. Students are asked whether it is lawful for a journalist to be placed under surveillance, connecting the discussion to Art. 4(3)(c) EMFA.
Reading. P. Breccia, Unione europea e uso di spyware: il caso Paragon tra prerogative di sicurezza nazionale e Media Freedom Act, federalismi, 3 December 2025; V. Pupo, Il caso Paragon Solutions: spyware e segreti, Osservatorio costituzionale, 4/2025.
Week 4
The privatization of censorship: disinformation and COVID-19
Topics. The DSA; the structure and functioning of oversight boards; the Code of Practice on Disinformation; and the German judgment upholding the removal of COVID-19 vaccine posts (Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main, 14 November 2024, no. 16 U 52/23).
Focus. Social-media platforms removing posts (for instance the cases concerning Biden’s son and Trump); disinformation about COVID-19 vaccines.
Method. News videos on the cases (for example «President Trump Permanently Banned From Twitter | NBC», https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqyaAJwJuQU). Students discuss lawfulness, who should decide on the removal of a post (public or private authorities), what counts as disinformation, and whether it falls outside — or within — protected freedom of expression.
Week 5
Working group — case discussion
Method. Rather than the classic research assignment, students build genuine «case files».
Students prepare. The facts; the applicable rules; the relevant CJEU case law; a proposed solution — and present them to the class.
Tracks. Media freedom and pluralism under the EMFA; Editorial independence under the EMFA; The privatization of censorship; Disinformation and democracy.
Week 6
Working group — case discussion
Method. Rather than the classic research assignment, students build genuine «case files».
Students prepare. The facts; the applicable rules; the relevant CJEU case law; a proposed solution — and present them to the class.
Tracks. Media freedom and pluralism under the EMFA; Editorial independence under the EMFA; The privatization of censorship; Disinformation and democracy.
Week 7
Freedom of expression and Defamation
Topics. Freedom of expression; defamation law and liability.
Focus. Balancing reputation protection with press freedom and defenses (truth, public interest). Strategic lawsuits against public participation
Method. The topic is introduced by the Professor and then explored in greater depth by the students who chose this week’s topic, with specific reference to their chosen case study. This student presents and discusses this case study within their own group. The assignment concludes with a presentation to the whole class summarizing the outcomes of the group discussion, and the submission of a short report on the results of that discussion.
Week 8
Protection of sources and investigative journalism
Topics. Protection of journalistic sources; Truth between critique and Investigation.
Focus. Legal and practical limits on source confidentiality and investigative reporting.
Method. The topic is introduced by the Professor and then explored in greater depth by the students who chose this week’s topic, with specific reference to their chosen case study. This student presents and discusses this case study within their own group. The assignment concludes with a presentation to the whole class summarizing the outcomes of the group discussion, and the submission of a short report on the results of that discussion.
Week 9
Collective memory, digital identity and the right to be forgotten
Topics. Online profiles, persistent archives, reputational harms. Erasing and delisting.
Focus. How digital permanence affects personal identity and remedies beyond delisting.
Method. The topic is introduced by the Professor and then explored in greater depth by the students who chose this week’s topic, with specific reference to their chosen case study. This student presents and discusses this case study within their own group. The assignment concludes with a presentation to the whole class summarizing the outcomes of the group discussion, and the submission of a short report on the results of that discussion.
Week 10
Disinformation
Topics. Disinformation ecosystems; platform countermeasures.
Focus. Disinformation as a political tool. Legal responses to disinformation.
Method. The topic is introduced by the Professor and then explored in greater depth by the students who chose this week’s topic, with specific reference to their chosen case study. This student presents and discusses this case study within their own group. The assignment concludes with a presentation to the whole class summarizing the outcomes of the group discussion, and the submission of a short report on the results of that discussion.
Week 11
Hate speech
Topics. Hate speech regulation; platform moderation and criminal law
Focus. Distinguishing unlawful hate speech from protected speech and proportional enforcement.
Method. The topic is introduced by the Professor and then explored in greater depth by the students who chose this week’s topic, with specific reference to their chosen case study. This student presents and discusses this case study within their own group. The assignment concludes with a presentation to the whole class summarizing the outcomes of the group discussion, and the submission of a short report on the results of that discussion.
Week 12
Satire
Topics. Satire and parody in media law; satire’s relationship to reality; artistic freedom; the political function of satire.
Focus. How satire shapes political discourse and public opinion, its democratic role, and legal limits (defamation, public order, and platform moderation).
Method. The topic is introduced by the Professor and then explored in greater depth by the students who chose this week’s topic, with specific reference to their chosen case study. This student presents and discusses this case study within their own group. The assignment concludes with a presentation to the whole class summarizing the outcomes of the group discussion, and the submission of a short report on the results of that discussion.