HISTORY AND POLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY

HISTORY AND POLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY

Jean-Pierre Darnis

Obiettivi formativi

Technology is often presented today as a total factor, capable of affecting the whole of social life and the concept of a technology-driven society highlights the various “disruptions” that are attributed to certain technological developments. In the 1990s the expression “digital revolution” appeared, which for many represents a watershed, determining a “before” and “after.” Historical analysis however often fails to consider the technological factor as a relevant category. If we reason in terms of “global history,” we can observe a chronological and sectorial structuring around international relations which includes the political evolution of various nations, ideological, economic and social factors or the history of individuals, insisting for example on the lives of certain leaders and their actions but also analyzing changes in societies with a sociological approach. The emergence of technology as an all-encompassing key in twenty-first century society leads us to two kinds of reasoning. The first is to look closely at global history to determine whether there are precedents that allow us to nurture critical reflection on the “revolution” underway. From this point of view, the multiple readings that oppose technology and humanity often represent a classic projection of the fears that people project onto their own destiny. The second, is to analyze in historical depth the connection between technological evolution and politics, also in order to contribute to the growth of an awareness that is meant to be synonymous with the strengthening of the instruments of governmentality. Technology does not represent a factor per se, a “deus ex macchina” that produces “magical” consequences after its sudden appearance: it is the fruit of a sociology both in its maturation and in its implementation, when it is then industrialized and disseminated, which points to the need for a deeper knowledge of the conditions of development and adoption of technology.

Risultati di apprendimento attesi

Understanding of technological, historical and political dynamics and logical interconnections between them. Technologies are now synonymous with radical changes in the social order, and it is necessary to deepen this technological nexus in order to be able not only to develop critical skills, but also to awaken among students a greater ability to assess the opportunities and risks associated with it, in both the economic and political context. Comparing different interpretative approaches to a historical and technological event and being able to critically evaluate the deeper meaning of the event in a broader context with impact on today’s political and social problems. This enhances independent and critical thinking. Public Speaking and communication skills, through summary presentations and document analysis exercises in class. A participative laboratory exercise will be conducted in order to build up an historically and politically informed negotiation capability around a technological question. Students will be divided in groups in order to perform collective work that will be graded. This presentation/laboratory work will contribute to 30% of the final mark. The remaining 70% will be acquired through an oral exam. IMPORTANT : Students who benefit from an attendance exemption won’t be involved in the laboratory. Their mark will exclusively be determined by the oral exam.

Contenuti Del Corso

This course will look at the development of technology since WW2 and the main international trends. Technology represents a very effective key to provide an analysis of important political and social evolutions. Furthermore, in many cases technology is considered a transformative factor, meaning that it is not only the description of human production within the evolution of society but the production itself shapes the evolution of society. Between the 20th and 21st century, the digital revolution has created a new paradigm where the relation between human and technology is changing, which leads to a new set of analysis.

Testi Di Riferimento

THE AGE OF SURVEILLANCE CAPITALISM ; THE FIGHT FOR A HUMAN FUTURE AT THE NEW FRONTIER OF POWER, Shoshana Zuboff, PROFILE BOOKS, 2019. Additional readings will be assigned by the instructor.

Metodologie Didattiche

The course will integrate traditional teaching with student presentations and debates that will stimulate the participation of each student in the activities of the class.

Modalità di verifica dell'apprendimento

Final oral exam.

Criteri per l’assegnazione dell’elaborato finale

A final course grade of at least 28/30.

Settimana 1

Are we afraid of the machines? Technology should not be considered an autonomous field to be studied separately, but can help develop an integrated vision of human society based on technological evolution. The period beginning after WW2 illustrates this trend, with a further acceleration after the “digital revolution”. The relation between technology, history and politics raises questions about the relations between human and machine, to be linked with a historical anthropology approach. _Technology as an anthropomorphic activity? _History and technology, main elements and questions.

Settimana 2

Hunting and Killing: the weapons paradigm for technological development _weapon development, a key human activity _strategic and political dimension of technological developments. The different questions of power linked to the arms industry. _ WW1, the “Great War” between attrition and technological revolution _the end of WW2 and the development of atomic weapons. A new strategic paradigm?

Settimana 3

The technological dimension of the Cold War Defense technology as a key feature/development for the reach of military supremacy/deterrence (development of weapons, nuclear race.) The Cold War, a technological victory? The case of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) within Ronald Reagan’s US presidency. What policies for technological development between state action and private companies ? Different models between global leaders (US and USSR), and EU countries for technological development Focus : French strategic autonomy and its consequences in terms of defense and technological development vs the Italian industrial public model. The switch between a “defense” technological push to a “civilian” technological push. A new paradigm? To what extent?

Settimana 4

Space policy, an historical approach History of space policy and its ideology. Russian cosmism, Space as a New Frontier in the USA, Scientific exploration approach in Europe. The “Space Race” during the Cold War between the USA and USSR : technological superiority, human flight and strategic competition for launchers. After the Cold War, a “service based” approach for space technology. International space policy and institutions : institutional and regulatory development in a multilateral framework. Focus : the development of space policy in Italy, France and the EU.

Settimana 5

Space policy in the twenty first century A privatization of Space ? : USA’s “New Space” policy and new space actors. The transformation of the US model for Space and its international consequences. The “tech” approach to Space : Elon Musk’s Space X and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin. Integration of Space in a “data dominance” concept ? The relaunch of geopolitical competition in Space between China and the USA. Focus : EU Space policy facing international pressure (USA, China) and the need for autonomous capacity.

Settimana 6

From the age of Television to social networks, transformation of the media Television as a mass communication media. The evolution of the economic and control model of media through the television age. Advertisement and marketing for mass media. The use of television by political power (communication, control) New digital medias : internet, social networks . User-interaction based model. Editorial and control questions raised by new medias.

Settimana 7

ICT (Information Communication Technologies) development. Information age, telecommunications development, internet protocols. Actors and trends. Internet and the political vision of an “open” society in the 20th century. The 21st century digitalization shift: mass diffusion of smartphones, the individual data production trend (main technological steps) and its aggregation and processing The surveillance capitalism paradigm Transformation of the society through digital push. The cybernetic dimension of defense (cyberdefense).

Settimana 8

History of data policy in the twenty-first century. Max Shrems, Snowden case, Cambridge Analitica, Wikileaks as topical moments for the policy evolution : analysis of crisis and consequences Rule of law in the digital world : cyber crimes. The question of propaganda and influence.

Settimana 9

_The role of the EU Commission and the antitrust nexus. Competition oriented policies. _The regulation paradigm (GDPR, DSA, DMA, AI act) _A technological and industrial policy . From research program to policy action plan _Pan European technological initiatives. EU Space flagship programs (Galileo, Copernicus), European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPCJU), Focus : The EU and defense technologies

Settimana 10

Laboratory activity : advocacy around the Shrems cases and the transatlantic question of data transfer

Settimana 11

A transformation of political sovereignty within technology ? _geopolitical competition for technology. US/China rivalry and its technological dimension. _The evolution of EU concepts. Technological sovereignty versus strategic autonomy. _Transatlantic dimension of technological sovereignty

Settimana 12

The questions of politics and democracy within the digital age: after the “surveillance capitalism” model, Is there a risk of a “surveillance totalitarian” trend ? _rule of law in the digital age _utilization of digital tools by political forces _propaganda and destabilization within the political arena. The question of “foreign” intrusion. _political actions driven by technological actors, the end of separation of powers? _national sovereignty versus digital sovereignty: limits and resilience of the nation-state level.