ECONOMICS FOR ENTREPRENEURS AND INNOVATORS
Risultati di apprendimento attesi
Explain international economic dynamics, specifically with reference to innovation, trade and MNEs (essential skill: processing information)
Compare diverse typologies of urban and regional economies as ‘habitats’ for innovative firms and their contribution to local development (essential skill: processing and comparing information)
Explain diverse types of urban and regional economies influencing the strategies of innovative MNEs (essential skill: processing and comparing information)
Support with theoretical and empirical insights the design of policies and strategies to attract and retain successful innovative firms (essential skill: using information)
Develop proficiency in identifying and solving conceptual and empirical problems when engaging with the academic literature (essential skill: interpreting and criticizing information)
Report orally on the working method followed by the proposed academic works (essential skill: effective communication).
Contenuti Del Corso
This course aims at developing conceptual and empirical understanding of the interplay between globalization processes and innovation intended as both firm-level and territorial-level process of knowledge creation aimed at generating competitive advantage. Hence, specific emphasis is placed on the increasing importance of firms within regions and in global markets. These include exporting firms as well as multinational enterprises (MNEs), their localization strategies, the patterns and impacts of international trade, the unfolding of global value chains and the regional asymmetries in channeling global forces towards innovative activities and local economic development objectives.
We aim at providing answers to many questions by drawing on an interdisciplinary approach that brings together different and complementary scholarly traditions . What are the main forces of today’s globalization? How are trade and foreign direct investment intertwined? What are multinational enterprises? What are their geographical and innovation-related corporate strategies? How does the regional environment influence them? How do changing fragmentation of value chains and simultaneous expansion of knowledge networks influence the agglomeration of corporate functions? What is the impact of MNEs on urban and regional economies? Should cities and regions actively attract MNEs, as the playing field becomes more complex and the concern over corporate power grows?
The course rests on the acknowledgment that important global-local linkages are key to understanding innovation and entrepreneurship in the perspective of regional development in a globalized world. Urban and regional features matter to exporting firms and MNEs and, conversely, engaging with global actors matter to urban and regional economies in terms of opportunities for new ventures and innovativeness. The former idea is based on the recognition that urban regions offer relevant and favorable environments to corporate activities, as evidenced by the actual location choices and patterns of international business activity. The latter statement is based on a view of exporting firms and MNEs as creators of jobs and incomes, and as sources of productivity, innovation, new skills and technology, directly and through spillovers.
Testi Di Riferimento
Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. (2017). International Economics: Theory and Policy, the latest edition.
The asterisk * denotes compulsory readings in the remainder of this syllabus.
Metodologie Didattiche
The course adopts a research-led teaching approach that integrates theoretical foundations with contemporary empirical evidence. Lectures are designed to provide students with a structured understanding of key concepts, frameworks, and debates within the field, drawing extensively on current academic literature as well as the instructor’s own research where relevant. This ensures that students are exposed to cutting-edge developments and are encouraged to critically engage with ongoing scholarly conversations.
Each week is structured around a combination of a lecture and a seminar. The lecture component focuses on the introduction and explanation of core topics, while also highlighting methodological approaches and real-world applications. The seminar component is student-led and aims to foster active learning, critical thinking, and peer-to-peer engagement. Students are expected to prepare and deliver presentations on assigned topics or readings, which serve as a basis for in-depth discussion, constructive feedback, and collaborative analysis.
This dual format is designed to balance knowledge transmission with participatory learning, enabling students not only to acquire subject-specific expertise but also to develop key transferable skills such as critical evaluation, academic communication, and independent research.
Modalità di verifica dell'apprendimento
Assessment in this course is designed to evaluate both students’ ongoing engagement and their overall understanding of the material.
During the course, students will be assessed through their performance in seminar presentations. Each student (or group of students, depending on class size) will be assigned a topic and will be expected to deliver a structured presentation, demonstrating their ability to critically engage with the relevant literature, communicate key ideas effectively, and contribute to class discussion. This component is intended to assess not only subject knowledge but also presentation, teamwork (where applicable), and analytical skills.
At the end of the course, students will complete a written examination. The format of the exam may consist of either open-ended questions or multiple-choice questions, depending on the number of students enrolled. The final examination is designed to assess students’ comprehensive understanding of the course content, their ability to synthesize key concepts, and their capacity to apply theoretical and empirical insights to relevant questions.
Criteri per l’assegnazione dell’elaborato finale
Any student who achieves a score above 28 in this course, and is interested in being supervised by the professor for the final thesis, can contact the professor directly to discuss thesis supervision.
Settimana 1
Week 1 – Course introduction
In this week, we introduce the course by providing an overview of the various features of contemporary economic globalization.
*Rodrik D., 2020. Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, Culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. NBER Working Paper N. 27526.
Baldwin R.E. and Martin P., 1999. Two waves of globalisation: Superficial similarities, fundamental differences. NBER Working Paper N. 6904.
Lindert P.H. and Williamson J.G., 2003. Does globalization make the world unequal? In Bordo M.D., Taylor A.M. and Williamson J.G. (Eds.), Globalization in Historical Perspective. University of Chicago Press.
Settimana 2
Week 2 – Classical trade theories and evidence
In this week, we discuss the classical views of trade based on the notions of absolute and comparative advantage.
*Costinot, A., and Donaldson, D., 2012. Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage: old idea, new evidence. American Economic Review, 102(3), 453-458.
Settimana 3
Week 3 – Trade and factor endowments
In this week, we address how trade exchanges can arise from factor proportion differences across space, possibly determining specialization patterns in specific activities across countries and regions.
*Autor D.H., Dorn D. and Hanson G., 2013. The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review 103(6), 2121-68.
Topalova, P., 2010. Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: Evidence on poverty from India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), pp.1-41.
Settimana 4
Week 4 – The case for and against trade-led globalization and economic development
In this week, we analyze the relationship between openness to global markets and development opportunities by also considering the role of skill-biased technological change
*Krueger, A. O. (1997) Trade Policy and Economic Development: How we Learn. American Economic Review, 87(1). * Rodrik D. (2001) The Global Governance of Trade as if Development Really Mattered. https://www.sss.ias.edu/files/pdfs/Rodrik/Research/global-governance-of-trade.pdf
*Fajgelbaum, P.D., Goldberg, P.K., Kennedy, P.J. and Khandelwal, A.K., 2020. The return to protectionism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), pp.1-55.
Bhagwati J. (2004) In defense of globalization, Oxford University Press. Chapters 1, 2, 3 & 4.
Lindauer, D. and Pritchett, L. (2002) What’s the Big Idea? The Third Generation of Policies for Economic Growth. Economia
Easterly, W. (2007). Globalization, poverty, and all that: Factor endowment versus productivity views. In Globalization and poverty (pp. 109-142). University of Chicago Press.
Page, J. (1994) The East Asian Miracle: Four Lessons for Development Policy
Oded, G. and Mountford, (2007) Trading Population for Productivity: Theory and Evidence. Review of Economic Studies, 75(4).
Settimana 5
Week 5 - Trade and inequality
In this week, we will discuss how openness to global markets may be conducive of disparities across countries and within countries, also in terms of innovation and entrepreneurial opportunities.
*Autor D. Dorn D. and Hanson G., 2013. The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the US. American Economic Review 103(6), 2121-2168.
* Krugman, Paul (1996), “White collars turn blue,” article for centennial issue of the NYT magazine http://mit.edu/krugman/www/BACKWRD2.html.
Freeman, R. (1995) Are you Wages Set in Beijing? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (3), 15-32.
Wood, A. (1998) Globalisation and the Rise in Labour Market Inequalities, Economic Journal, 108, 1463-1482. Goldberg, P. and
Pavcnik, N. (2007) “Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries.” Journal of Economic Literature.
Settimana 6
Week 6 – New Trade Theory
In this week, we will analyze the features of modern trade that can be hardly explained by prior theories. Specifically, we focus on intra-industry trade and firm decisions to engage in global markets.
Bernard, A., S. Redding and P. Schott, 2007. Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 105-130.
Krugman, P., 1980. Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review 70, 950-959.
Settimana 7
Week 7 – Heterogeneous firms
In this week, we will analyze firm decisions to engage in global markets and how R&D and innovation activities are related to this global expansion.
*Bernard, A.B., Jensen, J.B., Redding, S.J. and Schott, P.K., 2012. The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade. Annu. Rev. Econ., 4(1), pp.283-313.
Bernard, A., S. Redding and P. Schott, 2007. Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 105-130.
Melitz, M., 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71, 1695-1726.
Melitz, M. and Ottaviano, G.I., 2008. Market size, trade, and productivity. The review of economic studies, 75(1), pp.295-316.
Settimana 8
Week 8 - Global Production Networks
This week addresses the participation of firms and locations to global networks of production. Therefore, we will focus on the functional fragmentation and integration of the production process at the global scale and the implications for the firms and locations involved at its different stages.
*Crescenzi, R., & Iammarino, S. (2017). Global investments and regional development trajectories: the missing links. Regional Studies, 51(1), 97-115.
Iammarino, S. (2018). FDI and regional development policy. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3), 157-183.
Ascani, A., Bettarelli, L., & Resmini, L. (2025). Unpacking the black box of knowledge externalities: intra-MNE networks vs. spatial spillovers. Papers in Regional Science, 100115.
Castellani, D., Marin, G., Montresor, S., & Zanfei, A. (2022). Greenfield foreign direct investments and regional environmental technologies. Research Policy, 51(1), 104405.
Crescenzi, R., Gagliardi, L., & Iammarino, S. (2015). Foreign multinationals and domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity. Research Policy, 44(3), 596-609.
Qiao, Y., Ascani, A., & Morrison, A. (2024). External linkages and regional diversification in China: The role of foreign multinational enterprises. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(4), 1077-1101.
Timmer, M.P., Miroudot, S., deVries G., (2019), Functional specialisation in trade, Journal of Economic Geography, 19(1), 1-30.
Nilsen, T., (2019), Global production networks and strategic coupling in value chains entering peripheral regions, The Extractive Industries and Societies, 6(3), 815-822.
Settimana 9
Week 9 – Multinational enterprises and foreign direct investment
This week offers a conceptual perspective on multinational companies and their foreign direct investment by combining different strands of literature. Specific attention is devoted to the very ‘raison d’être’ of multinationals in a global economy and their competitive advantage.
*Buckley P. and Ghauri P., 2004. Globalisation, economic geography and the strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35, 81-98.
*Davies R.B. and Markusen J., 2020. The structure of multinational firms’ international activities. CESifo Working Paper N. 8150
Almeida R., The labor market effects of foreign owned firms. Journal of International Economics 72(1), 75-96.
Antràs P., 2003. Firms, contracts and trade structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4), 1375-1418.
Antràs P. and Rossi-Hansberg E., 2009. Organizations and trade. Annual Reviews of Economics 1, 43-64.
Cantwell J. and Narula R., 2001. The eclectic paradigm in the global economy. International Journal of the Economics of Business 8(2), 155-172.
Zaheer S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38, 34-63.
Settimana 10
Week 10 – The location strategies of multinational enterprises
This week addresses, theoretically and empirically, the multifaceted issues related to the location strategies of MNEs by considering different drivers and motivations driving corporate strategies in foreign markets.
*Defever F. 2006. Functional fragmentation and the location of multinational firms in the enlarged Europe. Regional Science and Urban Economics 36(5), 658–677.
*Goerzen A., Asmussen C. and Nielsen B., 2013. Global cities and multinational enterprises location strategy. Journal of International Business Studies 44, 427-450.
Alcácer J. and Chung W., 2007. Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science 53(5),760–776.
Ascani A., Crescenzi R. and Iammarino S., 2016. Economic institutions and the location strategies of European multinationals in their geographic neighborhood. Economic Geography 92(4), 401-429.
Belderbos R., Du H.S. and Goerzen A., 2017. Global cities, connectivity, and the location of choice of MNC regional headquarters. Journal of Management Studies 54(8), 1271-1302.
Harding T. and Javorcik B., 2011 Roll out the red carpet and they will come: Investment promotion and FDI inflows. Economic Journal 121(557), 1445–1476.
Head K., and T. Mayer. 2004. Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(4), 959–972.
Settimana 11
Week 11 – MNEs and recipient regions: linkages and spillovers
This week addresses the long-standing topic of the impact of MNEs on recipient economies, especially in terms of innovation potential. We will consider traditional ideas and new developments on this issue.
*Alfaro L., 2017. Multinational activity in emerging markets: How and when does foreign direct investment promote growth? In Alcacer J., Kogut B., Thomas C. and Yeung B.Y., (Eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, Geography, Location and Strategy, Volume 36. Emerald Insight.
*Haskel J., Pereira S. and Slaughter M., 2007. Does inward FDI boost the productivity of domestic firms? Review of Economics and Statistics 89(3), 482-496.
Ascani A. and Gagliardi L., 2020. Asymmetric spillover effects from MNE investment. Journal of World Business, forthcoming.
Ascani A. and Iammarino S., 2018. Multinational enterprises, service outsourcing and regional structural change. Cambridge Journal of Economics 42(6), 1585-1611.
Javorcik, B. 2004. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review 94, 605-627.
Javorcik, B. S., Lo Turco, A., & Maggioni, D., 2018. New and improved: does FDI boost production complexity in host countries? The Economic Journal, 128(614), 2507-2537.
Lu, Y., Tao, Z. and Zhu, L., 2017. Identifying FDI spillovers. Journal of International Economics, 107, pp.75-90.
Rojec, M., and Knell, M. 2018. Why is there a lack of evidence on knowledge spillovers from Foreign Direct Investments? Journal of Economic Surveys 32(3), 579-612.
Poole J., 2013. Knowledge transfer from multinationals to domestic firms: Evidence from worker mobility. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(2), 393-406.
Settimana 12
Week 12 – MNEs and origin regions: network effects and offshoring
This week, we will focus on the effects that foreign direct investment has on the locations of origin of the MNE, through various mechanisms such as network dynamics and offshoring.
*Bathelt H. and Buchholz M., 2019. Outward foreign direct investment as a catalyst of urban-regional income development? Evidence from the United States. Economic Geography 95(5), 442-466.
Bernard A.B., Fort T.C., Smeets V. and Warzynski F., 2020. Heterogeneous globalization: Offshoring and reorganization. NBER Working Paper N. 26854.
Ascani A., Bettarelli L., Resmini L., Balland P., 2020. Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation. Research Policy 49(8).
Bathelt H., Malmberg A. and Maskell, P., 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buss, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1), 31–56.
Iammarino, S., 2018. FDI and regional development policy. Journal of International Business Policy 1 (3–4), 157–183.
Turkina E. and van Assche A., 2018. Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters. Journal of International Business Studies 49, 706–728.