COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW

COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW

Valentina Rita Scotti, Giovanni Rizzoni

Obiettivi formativi

The course aims at providing the students with the main instruments for the analysis of the evolution of contemporary constitutionalism on a global scale through a comparative legal method. The participants in the course will learn how to manage traditional concepts– like constitutionalism, forms of state, forms of government – and new legal concepts – like legal transplants and borrowing, rule of law backsliding and democratic decay, European and nternational constitutionalism – featuring the study of comparative public law. They will be introduced to the main debates surrounding the research and the scholarship inquiry into this field, in particular the tension between universalism and context-based studies, the opportunity to apply normative notions such as “constitutionalism”, devised in the framework of the Western legal tradition, worldwide, and the use of foreign law by law-makers, judges, and constitution-making operators. The course will try to look at phenomena and public goods like the protection of fundamental rights, separation of powers, and the entrenchment of rule of law principles in general, in a multilevel perspective, that is looking at them not in isolation, within each domestic jurisdiction, but in their interplay amongst levels of government (national, supranational and international). By doing so the course aims to train the students to better understand the comparative constitutional dimensions of political and societal developments that by definition take place in multilevel settings (e.g. constitutional transitions, constitutional adjudication, conflicts of rights and amongst courts). In particular, the course aims to allow the students to: • understand the main legal problems and controversies characterizing comparative public law today; • distill similarities and differences amongst constitutional systems from the perspective of the legal families (e.g. common law, civil law, Islamic law etc.), of the protection of the Constitution, and of the vertical and horizontal separation of powers; • improve their ability to engage in a critical analysis of ongoing developments at international and domestic level by using legal and constitutional arguments; • be able to assess the pros and cons of the implementation and enforcement of the law in context, depending on the features of a specific legal system and in compliance with the supranational and the international constraints; • be able to actively interact with public and private institutions and interest groups on issues like institution and constitution-building, relationship between legislatures and courts, judicial politics, treatment of minorities, limits to the action of the executive branch.

Risultati di apprendimento attesi

By the end of the course, students will be able to: • show an advanced knowledge of legal scholarship in the field of comparative public law, of the main schools of thoughts and research strands • detect legal problems connected to the enforcement of the law and propose concrete solutions to them based on a comparative methodology • understand the complexity of today’s legal systems, shaped by the interaction between the national (often even of a sub-national authorities), supranational and international levels of government Applying knowledge and understanding: Students will be able to apply the knowledge acquired during this course for their future professional activities, in particular in the following domains and fields: • disentanglement of the legal aspects from the political, societal and economic aspects of international and domestic problems – e.g. constitutional implications of economic and political crises, treatment of vulnerable groups – also drawing on comparative legal research • writing commentaries, briefs or case notes for policy-makers, private institutions and interest groups on issues like institution and constitution-building; • based on the comparative legal methodology, offering ad hoc legal consultancy to NGOs active at international and at national level Making judgements: Participants in the course will: • be put in a position to carry out autonomous research, collect scholarly and institutional materials, also using legal databases, and to elaborate the information from an independent and original perspective; • be equipped to provide a well-informed legal assessment of ongoing developments at national and international level; • be enabled to critically engage with the main theories and notions of comparative public law and to tailor their evaluation based on the country/countries under investigation. Communications Skills: From the very beginning of the course the instructors will devote a specific attention to train the students to develop an appropriate use of the legal English and to compare the notions studied across the jurisdictions. Therefore, by the end of the course, the students will be able to: • be aware of the similarities and differences of specific concepts across the countries (e.g. the meaning and use of the rule of law, of Constitution, of ruling/judgment/judicial decision, of law and legislation) • manage the legal terminology to be used also for their subsequent professional paths; • express the notions learnt with sufficient clarity and in an understandable manner in an international context Moreover, through class presentations and group work every student will have the opportunity to speak in public and to be involved in discussions to the topics studied on a regular basis. Learning skills: Through this course students will acquire the following skills: • ability to accomplish autonomous research and a doctrinal analysis of the different topics examined across time and space; • through the experiential learning provided by means of case law and legal texts’ analysis, simulation and discussions in class, their capacity to match theoretical concepts and notions with the empirical reality will be enhanced; • ability to manage the comparative legal methodology for the selection and the investigation of different case studies in the Global North and South • Improved expertise and competence in offering an independent and well-grounded legal assessment of international and legal developments supported by clear and sound arguments.

Contenuti Del Corso

The course will focus on some of the main issues and problems of contemporary constitutionalism. After a methodological introduction, it will start with an overview of the constitutional cycles. In this context, the key features of the contemporary constitutional State will be discussed, with particular reference to the instruments that ensure constitutional effectiveness and entrenchment, such as constitutional rigidity, reinforced amendment processes and constitutional review of legislation. This will also entail a reflection on the extent to which these classic notions can be referred to countries outside the Western legal tradition, as to include Africa and Asia. After an investigation into the instruments for the enforcement of the horizontal separation of powers, mechanisms of checks and balances, of the main forms of Government and of their practical evolution, the analysis will move to the vertical separation of powers and to federalizing processes. The study of the federal or quasi-federal arrangements will encompass countries like the US, Canada, Germany, India, the UK, Spain and the EU itself and will also include the treatment of the controversial issue of the separatist claims, through the analysis of secessionist attempts and of the constitutional implications of Brexit. The vertical separation of powers will also entail the analysis of the mechanisms of interaction between domestic and supranational/international sources of the law and courts, looking in particular at the European and the Latin America contexts and at the cases of conflicts of rights and of courts that the supranational governance may trigger. The course will then deal, from a multilevel perspective, with the topic of constitutional transitions, with reference to the European context (i.e. referred to the countries of the Council of Europe) and the to the MENA region, after the Arab Spring. Linked to this is the analysis of the current problematic trends of rule of law backsliding and democratic decay affecting several constitutional democracies nowadays, within and beyond Europe (e.g. Brazil, Chile, Hungary, Poland, Turkey).

Testi Di Riferimento

Selected chapters from: - R. Masterman and R. Schütze, The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (CUP, 2019). - M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajò, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP, 2012). Readings are available via LUISS on-line subscriptions. Other articles and papers will be uploaded on the course’s web page if needed (LUISS learn). Please, note that judgments and the legal texts discussed in class and available on Luiss learn will have to be prepared for the oral exam.

Metodologie Didattiche

Instructors will use enquiry-based methodologies to make the most of the active and research-oriented participation of the students as learning devices. The sessions will consist of frontal lectures followed by a Q&A with the students as well as on group working on case law and legal texts (selected by instructors) and on discussions of legal problems and challenges.

Modalità di verifica dell'apprendimento

The assessment for this course is articulated as follows: - 30% of the grade will be based on a written test structured around multiple choice questions and an open question - 70% of the grade will be based on a final comprehensive oral exam. Please, note that the written tests does not exonerate students from the preparation on those parts of the syllabus for the oral exam. Students exempted from attending the course will be asked to prepare on two books of their choice between those listed below (all available through remote access via LUISS library) in addition to the regular readings in the syllabus for the oral exam: - Anderson and Choudry, Territory and Power in Constitutional Transitions, OUP, 2019, https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780198 836544.001.0001/oso-9780198836544 - - Sajò, Ruling by Cheating. Governance in Illiberal Democracy, CUP, 2021, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ruling-bycheating/25F75BCA4BD6E2585ACEB4F94E2669AE - - Suteu, Eternity Clauses in Democratic Constitutionalism, OUP, 2021, https://global.oup.com/academic/product/eternity-clauses-in-democraticconstitutionalism-9780198858867?lang=en&cc=ro - Spigno, Scotti, Lima Penalva da Silva (eds), The Rights of Women in Comparative Constitutional Law, Routledge, 2023, irene-spigno-valentina-rita-scotti-jana%C3%ADna-lima-penalva-da-silva

Criteri per l’assegnazione dell’elaborato finale

Having obtained at least 27 as the exam grade.

Settimana 1

Session 1 Introduction to the course. Methodology. Readings: - R. Hirschl, Comparative Methodologies, in the Cambridge Companion to Constitutional Law - A. Von Bogdandy, Comparative Constitutional Law: A Contested Domain: A. Comparative Constitutional Law: A Continental Perspective, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law Session 2 Legal families Readings: - M. Siems, chapters on Common Law and Civil Law and on Mapping the world’s legal systems, in M. Siems, Comparative Law, CUP, 2014 and Ugo Mattei, Comparative Law and Critical Legal Studies, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. How to write a case note and a legal commentary: simulation How to present a case law: simulation

Settimana 2

Session 1 Constitutions and Constitutionalism 1: Types of Constitutions Readings: - R. Schütze, Constitutionalism(s), in The Cambridge Companion (.) - S. Holmes, Constitutions and Constitutionalism, in The Oxford Handbook (.) - Lena Salaymeh, Ralf Michaels, Decolonial Comparative Law: A Conceptual Beginning, RabelsZ 86, 166–188 Session 2 Constitutions and constitutionalism 2 – constitutional entrenchment and rigidity Readings: - D. Grimm, Types of Constitutions, in The Oxford Handbook (.) - C. Geiringer, A New Commonwealth Constitutionalism?, in The Cambridge Companion (.) Team work: Comparing the texts of the US Constitution, the Portuguese Constitution, the Indian Constitution and the Israeli Basic Laws Presentation and discussion of the Indian Supreme Court judgment in the Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973), (basic structure doctrine)

Settimana 3

Session 1 Constitutional review of legislation 1: centralized and centralized models Readings: - C. Sanders, Courts with constitutional jurisdiction, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - V. Jackson, US Constitutional Law and History, in in The Cambridge Companion (.) Session 2 Constitutional Review of Legislation 2; judicial review of legislation in Europe Readings: - - C. Sanders, Courts with constitutional jurisdiction, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - V. Ferreres Comella, The European model of constitutional review of legislation: Toward decentralization?, in ICON, 2014 Presentation and discussion of United States Supreme Court, Marbury v Madison , 5 U.S. 137, 1803 Presentation and discussion of French Constitutional Council, decision n° 71-44 DC, 16 July 1971; decision n° 2010-92 QPC, 28 January 2011

Settimana 4

Session 1 Constitutional review of Legislation 3 - amparo and Verfassunsbeschwerde Readings: - C. Sanders, Courts with constitutional jurisdiction, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - A. Stone Sweet, Constitutional Courts, in The Oxford Handbook (.). Session 2 Constitutional review of Legislation 4 - Balancing, Proportionality, Reasonableness Readings: - C. Gearty, Human Rights Law, in in The Cambridge Companion (.) - V. Jackson, US Constitutional Law and History, in The Cambridge Companion (.) Presentation and discussion of the judgment of German Constitutional Court, case 1 BvR 653/96 Presentation and discussion of Minister of Home affairs v. Fourie, (Constitutional Court of South Africa, Case CCT 60/04)

Settimana 5

Session 1 Forms of government -parliamentary systems Readings: - C. Möllers, Separation of Powers, in the Cambridge Companion (.) - P. Dann, Governments, in the Cambridge Companion (.) Session 2 Forms of government – presidential and semi-presidential systems Readings: - C. Möllers, Separation of Powers, in the Cambridge Companion (.) - P. Dann, Governments, in the Cambridge Companion (.) Presentation and discussion of the UK Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011 and its repeal by the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 Opinion of the Venice Commission on presidential term limits

Settimana 6

Session 1 Federalism and regionalism: An introduction Readings: - R. Bifulco, Federalism, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - D. Halberstam, Federalism: Theory, Policy, Law, in The Oxford Handbook (.) Session 2 Federalism: US Readings: - R. Bifulco, Federalism, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - D. Halberstam, Federalism: Theory, Policy, Law, in The Oxford Handbook (.) Presentation and discussion of the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions Presentation and discussion of United States Supreme Court, McCulloch vs. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 1819

Settimana 7

Session 1 Federalism: US Readings: - R. Bifulco, Federalism, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - D. Halberstam, Federalism: Theory, Policy, Law, in The Oxford Handbook (.) Session 2 Federalism- Germany Readings: - R. Bifulco, Federalism, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - D. Halberstam, Federalism: Theory, Policy, Law, in The Oxford Handbook (.) Presentation and discussion of United States Supreme Court, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 2012 Presentation and discussion of German Constitutional Tribunal, 2 BvF 1/02, 18 December 2002

Settimana 8

Session 1 Federalism - India Readings: - R. Bifulco, Federalism, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - D. Halberstam, Federalism: Theory, Policy, Law, in The Oxford Handbook (.) Session 2 Multilevel constitutionalism – legal sources Readings: - R. Masterman, Multi-Layered Constitutions, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - K. Tuori, European Constitutionalism, in The Cambridge Companion (.) Presentation and discussion of Supreme Court of India, S.R. Bommai versus Union of India ,1994 Moot course exercise: simulation the decision making in the Court of Justice of the EU (part 1)

Settimana 9

Session 1 Multilevel constitutionalism: Courts Readings: - K. Tuori, European Constitutionalism, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - M. Claes, Luxembourg, Here We Come? Constitutional Courts and the Preliminary Reference Procedure, in German Law Journal, 2015. Or - J. Komarek, National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy, ICON, 2014. Session 2 The rule of law and democratic and rule of law backsliding in Europe Readings: A. Sajò, The rule of law, in The Cambridge Companion (.) - L. Pech and K. L. Scheppele, Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU Moot course exercise: simulation the decision making in the Court of Justice of the EU (part 2)

Settimana 10

Session 1 Constitutional transitions and transplants: Europe at large Readings: - M. Tushnet, Constitution, in the Oxford Handbook (.) - G. Halmai, Constitutional Transplants, The Cambridge Companion (.) Session 2 Constitutional transitions and transplants: The MENA region Readings: - M. Tushnet, Constitution, in the Oxford Handbook (.) - G. Halmai, Constitutional Transplants, The Cambridge Companion (.) Debate on the troubled implementation of the ECtHR judgment in Sejdic and Finci v Bosnia and Herzegovina more than twenty years later

Settimana 11

Session 1 Secession: theory and practice Reading: S. Mancini, The Oxford Handbook Session 2 Secession in the EU Readings: - S. Mancini, The Oxford Handbook (.) - C. Fasone, Secession and the Ambiguous Place of Regions Under EU Law, chapter. Presentation and discussion of Supreme Court of Canada, Re Secession Quebec [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217 Presentation and discussion of Court of Justice, Case C-502/19, Junqueras i Vies

Settimana 12

Session 1 The constitutional implications of Brexit Readings: - V. Bogdandor, Beyond Brexit (Tauris, 2019), Chapter 7 - A. L. Young, The constitutional implications of Brexit, in European Public Law Session 2 Constitutional democracy in trouble? The age of the pandemic Readings: - Tom Ginsburg, Mila Versteeg, The bound executive: Emergency powers during the pandemic, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 19, Issue 5, December 2021, Pages 1498–1535 (selected pages) - Golia et al., Constitutions and Contagion – European Constitutional Systems and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Heidelberg Journal of International Law, page 147 – 234 (selected pages) Presentation and discussion of the UK Supreme Court's judgments in Miller I (2017) and Cherry/Miller II (2019)