POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
Instructional goals
The course provides a critical analysis of the topics and issues in contemporary political philosophy and aims to develop critical thinking and the analytical skills of the students.
The course entails 3 parts aiming at confronting students with different levels of analytical depth:
1. the first part will provide a broad introduction to the main theories and approaches which emerge in the contemporary political philosophy debate.
2. the second section will consider key issues in contemporary liberal democratic theory (in particular, Rawls’ s Political Liberalism) and especially the ideas of legitimacy of political authority, public justification and consensus.
3. The third section will focus on the timely phenomenon of populism, which will be considered and problematized in light of the issue of pluralism.
Intended learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding:
By the end of the course, students will acquire:
•Better knowledge of the main texts and dilemmas emerged in the scholarly debate on Political Philosophy
•Improved understanding of different approaches and competing theories (e.g.: utilitarianism, contractarianism, libertarianism, etc.)
•Increased capacity to engage critically with the readings and the literature in the field and to connect a normative thinking about these problems to other, either empirical or juridical, perspectives.
Applying knowledge and understanding:
Students will be able to apply their acquired knowledge in their future academic path. In particular, students will be trained in:
• presenting critical arguments (both pro and contra) in relation to the theories object of the course
• Giving public talks, formulating objections, etc.
• Writing short academic essays
Making judgements:
Due to critical approach employed in the course and the emphasis placed on autonomous re-elaboration and critical discussion of the readings, students will be able to:
• Provide informed ethical assessments of the evolving political scenarios;
• Develop an autonomous and critical judgement view about political issues and problems
•write a short essay in which they will show to be able to engage with readings autonomously and present an independent point of view
Communication Skills:
During the course students will be asked to contribute to the discussion in several ways, via group discussions of pro and contra and case studies. Students are therefore expected to improve their communication skills and the overall degree and quality of participation in class discussions.
Learning skills:
By the end of the course students are expected to acquire the following skills:
• Improved ability to make intelligent use of informed ethical assessment to apply to the evolving political scenario
• Increased competence in providing well-organized and clear arguments in support of their views
• Increased expertise in debating about important facts that characterize political scenarios.
Course Contents
This course offers an introduction to the main issues in contemporary political philosophy. It provides students the opportunity to develop the abilities of theoretical and methodological analysis characteristic of the contemporary analytical approach in political philosophy.
The course entails 3 parts aiming at confronting students with different levels of analytical depth.
Part I: Theories in Contemporary Political Philosophy.
Part II: Liberal democracy, consensus and pluralism (reading Political Liberalism)
Part III: Freedom with Religions
Reference Books
Required readings:
Part I:
• Will Kymlicka, Introduzione alla Filosofia Politica, Feltrinelli 1996 – chapters 1,2,3 and 5
• Michael Sandel, Giustizia, Il Nostro Bene Comune, Feltrinelli 2009 –chapters 2, 3,6, 7 and 9.
Part II:
• Maffettone, S. Politica. LeMonnier, 2020 – Introduction and chapters 1 and 6
• J. Rawls, Liberalismo Politico, Einaudi 2012 – Introduction and chapters 4, 5, 6
Part III:
• Valentina Gentile, Libertà con le Religioni (Giappichelli 2024) chapters 1, 2, 3.
Teaching Methods
Teaching methods will include:
lectures,
presentations,
pros and cons, discussions,
guest lectures,
seminars.
Assessment Method
Midterm: 30%
Class participation, discussion and presentation: 20%
Final written exam: 50%
Thesis assignment criteria
Final Grade (above 28/30)
Week 1
Unità 1:
La giustizia e utilità, l’ Utilitarismo (Kymlicka 19-50 , Sandel 40-69)
Seminario I - Utilitarismo (Discussione: Che nesso c’è tra felicità e giustizia?)
Week 2
Unità 2:
L’uguaglianza liberale: I principi di giustizia di J. Rawls (Kymlicka 63-85 Sandel 160- 186, Maffettone cap.su Rawls, Galeotti E., Valentina G. Introduction pp. 7-15 in Biblioteca della libertà, LVII, 2022 maggio-agosto)
L’uguaglianza liberale: I principi di giustizia di J. Rawls II parte (Kymlicka 63-85 Sandel 160- 186, Maffettone cap.su Rawls, Galeotti E., Valentina G. Introduction pp. 7-15 in Biblioteca della libertà, LVII, 2022 maggio-agosto)
Week 3
Seminario II – Rawls (Discussione: Perché l’idea di un accordo? Per che cosa abbiamo bisogno della giustizia? Che differenza c’è tra bene e giusto? Che fine fanno le conseguenze?)
I prova intermedia:test a risposta multipla (10% voto finale)
Week 4
Unità 3
Egualitarismo della sorte: R. Dworkin II parte (Kymlicka 85-103, Sandel 188-207).
Seminario III – R. Dworkin (Discussione: Quali sono gli elementi che bisogna considerare quando si stabiliscono dei principi di giustizia? Quale ruolo viene assegnato alla sorte e alle circostanze? È giusto premiare i talenti? Che rapporto c’è tra scelte e circostanze)
Week 5
Unità 4
Libertarismo: R. Nozick (Kymlicka 110- 145, Sandel paragrafi 69-89)
Seminario IV: R. Nozick (Discussione: libertarismo vs egualitarismo che posizioni politiche presentano? Che cos’è il left libertarianism? È più giusto distribuire la ricchezza o favorire i meriti individuali?)
Week 6
Unità 5
Comunitarismo (Kimlicka 222- 259- Sandel 234-274).
Comunitarismo parte II (Kimlicka 222- 259- Sandel 234-274).
Week 7
Seminario V: Comunitarismo (Discussione: qual è il ruolo delle comunità? Perché la storia è importante? Come si dovrebbe interpretare l’identità?)
II prova intermedia test a risposta multipla (10% voto finale).
Week 8
Unità 6
Introduzione a “Liberalismo politico” di J.Rawls
Liberalismo politico I – Cap. IV (Rawls, Liberalismo Politico, Lezione IV)
Week 9
Liberalismo Politico III: -Cap. VI (Rawls, Liberalismo Politico, Lezione VI)
Prova intermedia risposte aperte (20% del voto finale)
Week 10
Unità 7
Libertà con le religioni – Introduzione (Gentile V., Libertà con le religioni, Introduzione e Cap. I)
Week 11
Libertà con religioni – Parte II (Gentile V., Libertà con le religioni, Cap. II)
Libertà con le religioni - Parte III (Gentile V., Libertà con le religioni, Cap. III)
Week 12
Seminari finali
Sentenza Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) (consultabile a https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/374/398/)
Sentenza Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. (2014)
Sentenza Eweida and others v. The United Kingdom (2013) CEDU (Discussione caso Eweida)
Sentenza Eweida and others v. The United Kingdom (2013) CEDU (Discussione caso Ladele)
Sentenza Ebrahimian v. Francia (2015) CEDU