Instructional goals
Provide students with fundamental knowledge of EU Law, also through the analysis of the most relevant case law and the current events. At the end of the course, students will be able to deeply understand the functioning of the EU legal order. Moreover, they will manage to comprehend the specificity and uniqueness of such legal system, which is on the border between international and constitutional law. It is a system which prevails over national laws and directs their evolution and development. Finally, students will be able to analyze and interpret current events thanks to their knowledges in the field of EU law.
Prerequisites
Good knowledge of English
Intended learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding: Students will acquire a specific knowledge on the main issues of EU Law, such as the development of European integration, the institutions, competences, the EU legal order, the protection of human rights, the impact of EU law on national legal orders, state liability, law making and judicial proceedings. This goal will be achieved through both theoretical lectures and the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The acquisition of these skills will be tested during class discussions throughout the course and also in the final test (written or oral). Written test will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the classes and opted for it instead of oral examination. Oral examination is the only option for other students.
Applying knowledge and understanding: Students will be able to handle and apply the norms and principles of EU law, also when facing specific cases. Moreover, they will be able to identify the role played by such principles and norms in the process of European integration. The acquisition of these skills will be tested during class discussions throughout all the course and also in the final test (written or oral). Written test will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the classes and opted for it instead of oral examination. Oral examination is the only option for all other students.
Making judgments: Students will be able to understand and analyze in a critical way the European integration and the role played by the European Union in the management of the past and future challenges. In addition, the analysis of the ECJ case law will help the development of a critical thinking.
Communication skills: Students will learn an appropriate legal vocabulary and gain appropriate communication skills in the field of EU law. This will be achieved through the analysis of both legal sources and case law. The skills will be tested during class discussions and also in the final test (written or oral). Written test will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the classes and opted for it instead of oral examination. Oral examination is the only option for all other students.
Learning skills: Skills acquired during the course will allow students to understand and interpret autonomously the forthcoming legislation and case law in the EU legal order. Moreover, students will develop a strong knowledge of the key topics of EU law, which will help them to deepen their studies in this field and to undertake different professional paths after the completion of their studies.
Course Contents
1) ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
2) INSTITUTIONS
3) EU LEGAL ORDER
4) COMPETENCE
5) LAW MAKING
6) IMPACT OF EU LAW ON NATIONAL LEGAL ORDERS
7) PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY, STATE LIABILITY AND CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
8) JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE CJEU
9) PRELIMINARY REFERENCE PROCEDURE
10) HUMAN RIGHTS
11) EXTERNAL ACTION OF THE EU
12) EU SUBSTANTIVE LAW: THE BASICS
Reference Books
For students who attended at least 80% of the course the book is optional. Their program, indeed, consists of: slides, materials and notes taken throughout the course.
Students who are not attendants are required to study the selected pages of the following book: European Union Law by R. Schütze, last edition, Cambridge, pp. 1-40, 41-59, 73-471, 480-496.
Legislation and case law analyzed during the classes will be available online, on the course LUISS Learn webpage.
Teaching Methods
Frontal teaching
Guest lecturing by Visiting Professors
Case studies
Assessment Method
The final exam consists either in a written or in an oral test. The former will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the course and opted for it instead of oral examination.
The written test will last 3 hours and will be composed of 14 multiple-choice questions, 3 open questions and 1 case study. The grade is expressed in thirtieths.
The final evaluation is made by adding the scores obtained, on the basis of the answers given to the questions of the test: the correct answer to each multiple-choice question gives a score equal to 1 (if no answer is given, or if the answer is incorrect, for that question no score will be awarded); to each answer to an open question or relating to a case study will be given a score from 0 to 5 according to the following criteria, based on the level of preparation shown: insufficient (0 points); sufficient (1 point); quite good (2 points); good (3 points); very good (4 points); excellent (5 points).
The failure to achieve at least the score of 18/30 will result in failure to pass the exam.
Correct answers to all multiple-choice questions and an excellent level of preparation in all open questions as well as in the examination of the case study result in a score of 30/30 cum laude.
In the open questions – for the purposes of awarding a score from 0 to 5 according to the above indications –, to assess the level of preparation of the student, the following evaluation criteria will be jointly taken into account: knowledge and understanding of the notions and principles of the matter and ability to apply them to concrete cases; appropriate use of the technical and legal vocabulary, ability to analyse and evaluate relevant sources and acquisition of the method of analysis.
2) The oral exam is the only option for all other students (i.e. did not attend at least 80% o classes or have not decided not to take the written test).
Both in the written and oral test, students will be required to show that they know and understand notions and principles of EU Law and that they are able to apply them to practical cases. Student are expected to be able to autonomously analyze sources and relevant theories of EU Law and to use the appropriate technical and legal vocabulary, thus proving that they have acquired the study method and the learning ability for carrying on, also autonomously, further study of the matter.
The following evaluation criteria will be taken into account to assign the final grade, expressed in thirtieths: knowledge and both theoretical and practical understanding of the notions and principles of the matter (65%); appropriate use of the technical and legal vocabulary, ability to analyze and evaluate relevant sources and acquisition of the study method (35%).
Gaps concerning one or more notions or principles will lead to an insufficient evaluation, even in presence of a basic knowledge of the matter.
Thesis assignment criteria
Positive outcome of the exam, interest in a critical understanding of the subject, good skills in bibliographical and case-law research, adequate knowledge of English (and possibly one more language amongst French, Spanish or German).
Week 1 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
1) ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
ONLINE:
1. Europe and European Union: an introduction to the subject and to the course
2. Theories on integration
3. Before the Treaties: the origins of integration and the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)
4. EEC and EURATOM Treaties
ON CAMPUS:
5. The early enlargements
6. The Single European Act
7. The Maastricht Treaty
8. Further enlargements
9. The Amsterdam Treaty
10. The Nice Treaty, EURO and further enlargements
11. The Constitutional Treaty
12. The Lisbon Treaty and further enlargements
13. Brexit
14. The response to COVID-19
Week 2 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
2) INSTITUTIONS
ONLINE:
1. Which are EU institutions?
2. The Commission
3. The Council
4. The European Council
ON CAMPUS:
5. The European Parliament
6. The European Central Bank
7. The CJEU
8. The Court of auditors
9. The High Representative
10. The Advisory bodies
11. The European Investment Bank
12. The Agencies
Week 3 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
4) COMPETENCE
ONLINE:
1. The principle of conferral
2. Exclusive competence
ON CAMPUS:
3. Shared competence and pre-emption
4. Subsidiarity and proportionality
5. Supporting, coordinating and supplementary competence
6. Two types of sui generis competence: a) economic, employment and social policy; b) Common Foreign and Security Policy (and defense policy)
7. Implied competence and flexibility
Week 4 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
3) EU LEGAL ORDER
ONLINE
1. Legal framework and primary law
2. General principles and the Charter
3. Article 288 TFEU
4. Binding Legal Acts: 5. regulations, 6. directives, 7. Decisions
ON CAMPUS:
8. Delegated and implementing acts
9. International agreements
10. Inter-institutional agreements
11. Soft law
12. CFSP acts
13. The hierarchy of norms
Week 5 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
5) LAW MAKING
ON LINE:
1. The legislative initiative
IN PRESENZA:
2. The ordinary legislative procedure
3. The special legislative procedures
4. The enhanced cooperation
Week 6 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
6) IMPACT OF EU LAW ON NATIONAL LEGAL ORDERS
ONLINE:
1. Direct effect: Treaty provisions and Van Gend en Loos
2. Direct effect: regulations, decisions, international agreements and (especially) directives
ON CAMPUS:
continuation n.2
3. Primacy
4. Direct effect and primacy, today
5. The extent of disapplication and the related derogations
Week 7 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
7) PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY, STATE LIABILITY AND CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
ONLINE:
1. Procedural autonomy
ON CAMPUS:
2. Consistent interpretation
3. State liability: Francovich and beyond
Week 8 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
8) JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE CJEU
ONLINE:
1. Distribution of competences between the Court of Justice and the General Court
2. Infringement
ON CAMPUS:
3. Annulment
4. Failure to act
5. EU extracontractual liability
Week 9 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
9) PRELIMINARY REFERENCE PROCEDURE
ONLINE:
1. The importance of Article 267 TFEU
2. The interpretation/validity dichotomy
ON CAMPUS:
3. Who can refer?
4. The notion of court/tribunal
5. Faculty and obligation to refer
6. The decision on the reference
7. The effect of the judgment
Week 10 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
10) HUMAN RIGHTS
ONLINE:
1. Origins, history and sources
ON CAMPUS:
2. The Charter
3. The Relationship with the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights (ECHR)
Week 11 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
11) EXTERNAL ACTION OF THE EU
ONLINE:
1. What actors?
ON CAMPUS:
2. Policies
3. International agreements
Week 12 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
12) EU SUBSTANTIVE LAW: THE BASICS
ONLINE:
1. Internal Market
IN PRESENZA:
2. Citizenship
3. Competition Law
4. Economic and Monetary Union