CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS PROTECTION IN CRISIS

CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS PROTECTION IN CRISIS

Valentina Rita Scotti

Instructional goals

The course aims at providing the students with the main instruments for the analysis of the global crisis affecting constitutional democracy and fundamental rights protection across the globe through a comparative legal method. The participants in the course will learn how to rethink traditional concepts of constitutionalism – such as democracy, rule of law, sovereignty – under a critical perspective. They will be introduced to the main debates surrounding the research and the scholarship inquiry into this field. The course will combine an institutional and conceptual map of this global crisis with an empirical scenario, according to which the crisis of constitutional democracy will be geographically map. The course aims to train the students to better understand the comparative constitutional dimensions of political and societal developments. In particular, the course aims to allow the students to: • understand the main legal problems and controversies characterizing democratic constitutionalism today; • distill similarities and differences amongst constitutional crisis taking place in different scenarios • improve their ability to engage in a critical analysis of basic concepts of public law • be able to assess the pros and cons of the implementation and enforcement of the law in context, depending on the features of a specific legal system and in compliance with the supranational and the international constraints. Instructors, in line with the educational goals connected to the Millennium Development Goals, will mainstream gender equality (also from an intersectional perspective) in the lectures. They will also underscore how the analyzed weaknesses of contemporary constitutional democracies affect minority groups and traditionally discriminated communities.

Intended learning outcomes

Knowledge and understanding: By the end of the course, students achieve an advanced knowledge of legal scholarship in the field of constitutional crisis and constitutional regression. They will be able to deal with the problems connected to such crises from the legal perspective. Students will also achieve an understanding of dynamics connected to these issues deriving from the increasing interpenetration of national (and often subnational), supranational and international aspects. Applying knowledge and understanding: Students will be able to apply the knowledge acquired during this course for their future professional activities. Namely, they will be able to: disentangle the legal aspects from the political, societal and economic aspects of international and national crises problems, relying on comparative legal scholarship; write commentaries, briefs or case notes for policy-makers, private institutions and interest groups on the issues tackled during the course; provide legal consultancy to stakeholders operating in the fields of rights’ violation and constitutional regression. Making judgements: Students will consolidate their ability to carry out autonomous research and elaborate information from an independent and original perspective.

Course Contents

The course consists of two parts, during which students are invited to actively participate through presentations, which form an important part of the course. Namely, the first part of the lectures, delivered by the instructors and by high-profile guest lecturers, will focus on the main challenges to constitutional democracies, focusing on one specific constitutional institution or concept in crisis. The second part of the lectures will directly involve students in mapping the crisis of constitutional democracy and fundamental rights protection geographically through students’ presentations, which will form the ground for instructors-led debates providing for a case-based application of the theoretical concepts investigated in the first part of the course. A monographic part of the course will be focused on the institutional crisis in Israel.

Reference Books

(selected chapters), András Sajó, Renáta Uitz, Stephen Holmes, Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism, 2022

Teaching Methods

Instructors will use enquiry-based methodologies to make the most of the active and research-oriented participation of the students as learning devices. Students will be evaluated throughout the course through multiple choice tests. Depending on the number of students enrolled, each student or each group of students will prepare a presentation, based on assigned readings, on the developments of a specific geographical dimension in the global map of the crisis of constitutional democracy.

Assessment Method

The assessment of the proficiency for this course is articulated as follows: - 25% of the grade will be based on the final oral exam - 25% of the grade will be based on a take-home test concerning the monographic part on Israel. - 25% of the grade will be determined by the quality of the presentation and by the active involvement in the group discussion - 25% of the grade will be determined by an intermediate multiple choice test, assessing the knowledge of the conceptual and institutional map of the crisis of constitutional democracy. Students failing to attend the multiple-choice test will write a short essay on a topic agreed with the instructor. Non-attending students will be assigned with extra-readings to be discussed during the final oral exam.

Thesis assignment criteria

None

Week 1

PROGR_LEZ_1 3800 Sì The case of Israel The First Phase: the absence of a written constitution: comparison between Israel and the EU The Second Phase: the "unwritten" Constitutional Revolution: the introduction of the power for judicial review: comparison between Israel and the EU Reading Materials: * Dave Kretzmer, The New Basic Laws on Human Rights: A Mini-Revolution in Israeli Constitutional Law? Israel Law Review, 1992, p. 238 at file://s-fs1/g_0122a.$/downloads/26IsrLRev238%20(1).pdf

Week 2

The case of Israel The Third Phase: the Constitutional Democracy in a Crisis: comparison between Israel and the EU Reading Materials: *https://verfassungsblog.de/populist-const-rev-israel/ *https://verfassungsblog.de/the-battle-over-the-populist-constitutional-coup-in-israel/ *https://verfassungsblog.de/an-unreasonable-amendment/ *Roznai, and Choen, Populist Constitutionalism and the Judicial Overhaul in Israel. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/israel-law-review/article/populist-constitutionalism-and-the-judicial-overhaul-in-israel/604758F6B3366CE6F8C100E1B386E6CA The Forth Phase: the legal tools to confront the Crisis: comparison between Israel the EU (Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments, Constitutional ultra vires, and procedural impediments; Article 7 TEU, Article 258 and 267 TFEU; Conditionality Regulation, Non Regression and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments) Reading materials: *https://verfassungsblog.de/an-unreasonable-amendment/ *Tímea Drinóczi and Pietro Faraguna, The Constitutional Identity of the EU as a Counterbalance for Unconstitutional Constitutional Identities of the Member States, European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2022, p. 57 in file://s-fs1/g_0122a.$/downloads/978-94-6265-595-9.pdf

Week 3

Conceptual and institutional map of the crisis of constitutional democracy - Sovereignty in crisis - Identity in crisis

Week 4

Conceptual and institutional map of the crisis of constitutional democracy -Separation of powers in crisis -Parliaments in crisis -Constitutional Adjudications in crisis

Week 5

Conceptual and institutional map of the crisis of constitutional democracy -Pluralism in crisis -Equality in crisis -Human Rights in crisis

Week 6

Conceptual and institutional map of the crisis of constitutional democracy -State / Church separation in crisis -Citizenship in crisis

Week 7

Mapping the crisis: - Hungary - Poland

Week 8

Mapping the crisis: - Balkan Peninsula - Türkiye

Week 9

Mapping the crisis - Mexico - Brazil

Week 10

Mapping the crisis - India - Indonesia

Week 11

Mapping the crisis - Tunisia - Egypt

Week 12

Wrapping up concepts: illiberalism, authoritarianism, constitutional backsliding, or democratic transition?