Instructional goals
For decades now, news stories have brought to public attention the countless social and ethical issues raised by the operations of all kinds of businesses. The latest wave of criticism began with the rash of scandals first brought to light in late 2001, when the Enron fraud was exposed: the Enron debacle was an ethical tsunami that redefined business’s relationships with society and the global community. Since then, other corporate names have been publicly shamed: Martha Stewart, Rite Aid, ImClone, HealthSouth, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Microsoft, Monsanto, Wal-Mart, Facebook, Tyco, Adelphia, Boeing, and many others. The global economic crisis that began in 2008 has added also banks, financial operators, and insurances to the list of ethically controversial business actors. In general, companies must today grapple with highly complex and vast societal concerns that far exceed the pursuit of a satisfactory bottom-line - and do so in a globalized, highly interconnected, instantly informed, and socially conscious environment. We shall be discussing the role of business in society, and whether business without ethics can be sustained in a world characterized by great economic uncertainty, financial insecurity, dramatic levels of inequality both within and among countries, fast-paced technological progress, stratified and sometimes contradictory legal requirements, weak global institutions, and a rampant environmental crisis. The Covid-19 pandemic will be considered, as well. Business Ethics raises questions about a host of widely diverse issues: executive powers, corporate governance, covert monopolies, delocalized production and outsourced labor, unmet or distorted health standards, the commercial implications of genetic research, the patents and copyrights regime, the accountability of financial institutions, businesses’ employment of political action committees to influence the outcome of legislation - along with the macrotheme of the overall sustainability - ecological, economic, and social - of current production and consumption patterns. .
Prerequisites
Familiarity with the main concepts of business organization and international political theory.
Intended learning outcomes
1. Knowledge and understanding
At the end of the course the student will have acquired a thorough knowledge and understanding of the ethical aspects of business, also observed from a comparative perspective and placed within the global context.
In addition to assessing learning through final exams - in written form - more qualitative evaluation devices will be adopted during classes (through videos, questionnaires, evaluation grids).
2. Capacity to apply knowledge and understanding At the end of the course the student will have learned to use ethical knowledge through classroom work, simulations and exercises. These teaching methods are designed to accustom students to deepen their knowledge of a given problem, to critically examine the different ways of dealing with and interpreting it, to defend their point of view in front of colleagues and teachers, to present the results of their reflections in written and/or oral form.
The lessons will include discussion of case studies and group project works;
All the lessons will be, in their various declinations and characterizations, aimed at providing the necessary tools and concepts to face the challenges to which organizations and institutions are and will be increasingly exposed. These challenges will cross various disciplinary contexts - e.g. digital transformations of organizational functions and processes, human intelligence/artificial intelligence interaction - and will increasingly characterize people's operations. In micro-design, therefore, particular attention will be devoted to the exploration of issues that impact first of all international companies and institutions, and then spread to other social entities.
3. Critical thinking The student is able to integrate knowledge and analyze the complexity of business phenomena in their ethical aspects, to identify problems and indicate solutions, even shared ones. Autonomy will be assessed through written tests and original comments on topics that are the object of in-depth study. Moreover, the assignment of projects during professionalizing teaching such as analysis and resolution of real cases, require the development of skills for the collection and processing of updated data and information. This course will give completion to the critical skills acquired in the other classes and laboratories of the program.
4. Communicative skills This class is taught entirely in English and therefore contributes to the mastery of this language also in the working environment. Students must have the ability to communicate the conclusions of their learning process, and to analyze and diagnose problems, in a clear and unambiguous way, with a language that is understood by both specialists and non-specialists. In order to achieve this objective, the instructor will use teaching materials complementary to textbooks (scientific articles, specialized press articles, reports of companies and institutions) that guide the student to the acquisition of the necessary technical language and the ability of public speaking.
5. Learning capacities The use of teaching methodologies that involve students and increase their capacity for autonomous judgement will contribute to their empowerment and make them protagonists in their own learning process. As students will have to deal with projects or cases, they will develop a greater awareness of their knowledge and skills and acquire the ability to organize their work autonomously. A problem-based approach in teaching activities will be fundamental to make students understand that cases or projects require the application of the knowledge acquired during classes, but also the autonomous research of new data, the creation of new models and the definition of innovative
Course Contents
The course includes four modules. Module 1 deals with the theoretical underpinnings of business ethics in ethical theory and various views of the nature of corporations. Module 2 explores various issues concerning business and global challenges, such as pandemics, climate change, financial crises, AI and cybersecurity. Module 3 deals with cross-cultural issues, such as genders, works conditions, cultures and lifestyles. Modules 4 focussess on the ethics of lobbying.
Reference Books
Required readings:
R. Audi, “The Place of Ethical Theory in Business Ethics”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP, 2009
“The Lunatic You Work for,” The Economist, May 2004: http://www.economist.com/node/2647328
Alexei Marcoux, “Business Ethics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2008
Ronald M. Green and Aine Donovan, “The Methods of Business Ethics “, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP, 2009
"Hongwei He and Lloyd Harris, “The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Philosophy,” Journal of Business Research 116 (August 2020): 176–82,
P.T. Mentzel, “Just Access to Health Care and Pharmaceuticals”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP, 2009
Arnold, Denis G., and Keith Bustos. "Business, Ethics, and Global Climate Change." Business & Professional Ethics Journal 24, no. 1/2 (2005): 103-30
van den Hove, Sybille & Le Menestrel, Marc & Bettignies, Henri-Claude. (2002). The oil industry and climate change: Strategies and ethical dilemmas. Climate Policy. 2. 3-18.
S. Power, M.L. Di Domenico, G. Miller, “The nature of ethical entrepreneurship in tourism”, Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 65, 2017, pp. 36-48
B. De Bruin, Ethics and the Global Financial Crisis. Why Incompetence is Worse than Greed, CUP, 2015, Introduction, chaps. 4, 6, 8
“A Care-based Stakeholder Approach to Cybersecurity in Business”
Teaching Methods
Case-studies, lectures, guided discussions, mini-polls, project works, guest lectures
Assessment Method
The course is meant to stimulate active dialogue rather than merely promote the absorption of relevant concepts and theories. Reading is therefore absolutely essential, and will be constantly supervised in various ways, especially with guided discussions, guided case analysis, and mini-questionnaires. The intermediate assessment (worth 70% of the final grade) will consist of guided discussions of texts and cases. Students will be asked to present a commentary and raise three critical objections to one of the papers on managerial authority (module 4). The final exam (worth 30% of the final grade) consists of answering three out of nine open-ended questions on the topic of managerial authority (module 4). Non-attending students will answer three out of nine open-ended questions on the entire reading list.
Thesis assignment criteria
None.
Week 1
Module 1/A. Introduction. Ethics, Markets, and Business Ethics Readings: R. Audi, 2009, “The Place of Ethical Theory in Business Ethics”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP, 2009; M. Friedman, 1970, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”, New York Times Magazine (September 13): 32–33, 122–124; K. G. Goodpaster, 2009, “Corporate Responsibility and Its Constituents”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP; M. Green & A. Donovan, 2009, “The Methods of Business Ethics”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP; L. Herzog, 2021, “Markets,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/markets/; M. Jeffrey, 2021, “Business Ethics,” ed. Edward N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-business/
Week 2
Module 1/B. Shareholder and stakeholder analysis, and the nature of corporations P.A. French, 1979, “The Corporation as a Moral Person”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3): 297–317; M. Velasquez, 1983, “Why Corporations are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do”, Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 2(3): 1–18
Week 3
Module 2/A. Global challenges (pandemics, climate change) Readings: H. He & L. Harris, 2020, “The Impact of Covid–19 Pandemic on Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Philosophy,” Journal of Business Research 116: 176–82; D.G. Arnold, & K. Bustos, 2005, "Business, Ethics, and Global Climate Change." Business & Professional Ethics Journal 24, no. 1/2: 103–30
Week 4
Module 2/ B. Global challenges (financial crises) Readings: B. De Bruin, 2015, Ethics and the Global Financial Crisis. Why Incompetence is Worse than Greed, CUP. Introduction, chaps. 4, 6, 8
Week 5
Module 2/C. Specific issues (gender, cultures and lifestyles, work conditions) Readings: T.L. Beauchamp, 2009, “Relativism, Multiculturalism, and Universal Norms: Their Role in Business Ethics”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP; D.G. Arnold, 2009, “Working Conditions: Safety and Sweatshops”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics; . McCall and P. Werhane, 2009, “Employment at Will and Employee Rights”, in G.G. Brenkert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, OUP; J. Dobson, J. & J. White, 1995, "Toward the Feminine Firm." Business Ethics Quarterly, 5: 463–78
Week 6
Module 4/A. Managerial authority: CSR Readings: E. Anderson, 2017, Private Government: How Employers Rule our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It), Princeton University Press, chaps. 1-2
Week 7
Module 4/B. Managerial authority: democracy and service Readings: C. McMahon, 2013, Public Capitalism: The Political Authority of Corporate Executives, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, chaps. 1-2-3
Week 8
Module 4/C. Managerial authority: democracy in workplace. Readings: 34. T. Christiano, 2010, “The Uneasy Relationship Between Democracy and Capital”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 27(1): 195–217; 37. G.K., Dow, 2003, Governing the Firm: Workers’ Control in Theory and Practice, CUP; I. Ferreras, 2017, Firms as Political Entities: Saving Democracy through Economic Bicameralism, CUP; 40. H. Landemore, & I. Ferreras, 2016, “In Defense of Workplace Democracy: Towards a Justification of the Firm-State Analogy”, Political Theory, 44(1): 53–81; 43. R. Mayer, 2000. “Is There a Moral Right to Workplace Democracy?”, Social Theory and Practice, 26(2): 301–325; J.J. McCall, 2001, “Employee Voice in Corporate Governance: A Defense of Strong Participation Rights”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 195–213; P.-I. Néron, 2010, “Business and the Polis: What Does it Mean to See Corporations as Political Actors?”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 94: 333-52; W. Orts, & N.C. Smith, 2017, The Moral Responsibility of Firms, New York: Oxford University Press; J. van Oosterhout, 2007, “Authority and Democracy in Corporate Governance?”, Journal of Business Ethics 71:359–370
Week 9
Guided discussions of the reading list
Week 10
Guided discussions of the reading list
Week 11
Guided discussions of the reading list
Week 12
General recap and exam preparation