EU INSTITUTIONS AND DECISION MAKING
Instructional goals
The instructional goals communicate the general aim of the teaching activity and provide the content of the course. They give direction to the course. They are broader than learning outcomes
The objective of this course is for students to acquire a thorough understanding of the workings of the European Union and its relevance to domestic and international politics today. Furthermore, the course also aims at students developing analytical, research and presentation skills through group work and the structured debate of key controversies in the EU integration process.
Intended learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding: Students will gain a thorough understanding of the institutional architecture of the European Union and of the nature of its decision-making processes, as well as an awareness of the legitimacy, effectiveness and transparency of EU institutions, both individually and collectively.
Applying knowledge and understanding: Students will learn how to critically assess the opportunities and limitations for decision-making in the EU’s system of multilevel governance.
Making judgements: Lectures and class discussions will impart on students the need to ask critical questions and to explore different possible answers to address these. Value will be given to open-ended questions and analysis of complex problems, rather than on description of bare facts.
Communications Skills: The course will be based on interaction teaching and include elements of problem- based and research-based learning. Students will work in groups to discuss, research and present their responses to key questions arising in the study of European integration. Structured debate in which opposing teams will argue about key controversies in the EU integration process will constitute an essential element of the course. Students will receive feedback not only on the substantive knowledge presented in their interventions, but also on the communication and rhetorical skills demonstrated in the process.
Learning skills: Students will gain the skills to discuss and analyse the nature of EU institutions and of the wider decision-making process, both in writing and orally.
Course Contents
The course examines the nature of the key institutions of the European Union, their interaction in the process of EU decision-making and their role in the wider governance arrangements in the EU. This includes not only in-depth analysis of (inter) institutional dynamics in Brussels, but also the relations with national governments, bureaucracies and agencies in the member states as well as with representatives of third countries. Furthermore, we will be exploring the manner in which EU institutions relate to organised interests, political parties, civil society organisations and indeed to citizens directly in order to ask questions about the democratic legitimacy of EU governance.
Reference Books
The following text serves as a general textbook providing useful chapters for most sessions:
- Hodson, D. and Peterson, J. (eds) (2021) The Institutions of the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
The Luiss Library has both a virtual version and a hard copy of the book. The latter can be read on the spot, no overnight loan is available. In order to access the virtual version, first you must edit the proxy configurations of your browser, and then you should open the book via the Luiss Library search engine.
Other useful general texts covering much of the course content are:
- Cini, M. and Borragan, N. P.-S. (eds) (2022) European Union Politics. Oxford University Press.
- Jørgensen, K. E., Pollack, M. A., & Rosamond, B. (eds) (2007). Handbook of European Union Politics. London: SAGE.
Those with no prior knowledge of the European Union are encourages to consult the following introductory texts: Nugent, N. (2019) The Government and Politics of the European Union (London: Palgrave Macmillan) and/or Dinan, D. (2014), Europe Recast - A History of European Union (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
Teaching Methods
Lectures, class discussions and structured debates.
Assessment Method
The course will be assessed through a take-home exam at the end of the course (Details will be announced in class and on Luiss Learn prior to the exam). There will be no mid-term exam. An extra point will be added to the exam grade for all students who attend every session and actively participate in the class discussions and debates.
Thesis assignment criteria
Minimum grade 29/30.
Week 1 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 1 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Introduction to the course
Session 2 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
Theories and Approaches to the Study of European integration (TC)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.1 Why EU institutions matter.
Christiansen, T. (2019). 'Governance in the European Union'. In M. Cini & N. P.-S. Borragan (Eds.), European Union Politics (6th ed., pp. 103–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fabbrini, S. (2017) ‘Intergovernmentalism in the European Union. A comparative federalism perspective’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24(4), pp. 580–597.
Kohler-Koch, B. and Rittberger, B. (2006) ‘Review Article: The “Governance Turn” in EU Studies*’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1), pp. 27–49.
Week 2 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 3 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
The EU Treaties and the Institutional Architecture (TC)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.2 The history of EU institutions.
Aspinwall, M. D., & Schneider, G. (2000). Same menu, separate tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration. European Journal of Political Research, 38(1), 1–36.
Christiansen, T. and Verdun, A. (2020), ‘Historical Institutionalism in the Study of European Integration’, Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics. Available via Luiss Learn
Session 4 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
The EU Policy Process (TC)
Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2003) ‘Formal and Informal Institutions Under Co-decision: Continuous Constitution-Building in Europe’, Governance, 16(4), pp. 577–600.
Reh, C. (2014) ‘Is informal politics undemocratic? Trilogues, early agreements and the selection model of representation’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(6), pp. 822–841
Mühlböck, M. and Rittberger, B. (2015) ‘The Council, the European Parliament , and the paradox of inter-institutional cooperation’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 19(4), pp. 1–20.
Week 3 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 5 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
The European Council (TC)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.3 The European Council.
Bocquillon, P. and Dobbels, M. (2013) ‘An elephant on the 13th floor of the Berlaymont? European Council and Commission relations in legislative agenda setting’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), pp. 20–38.
Puetter, U. (2012) ‘Europe’s deliberative intergovernmentalism: the role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), pp. 161–178.
Tallberg, J. (2008) ‘Bargaining power in the European Council’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(3), pp. 685–708.
Session 6 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
The European Parliament (DH)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.6 The European Parliament.
Fromage, D. (2018) ‘The European Parliament in the post-crisis era: an institution empowered on paper only?’, Journal of European Integration., 40(3), pp. 281–294.
Hix, S., Kreppel, A. and Noury, A. (2003) ‘The party system in the European parliament: Collusive or competitive?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2), pp. 309–331.
Egeberg, M. et al. (2013) ‘Parliament staff : unpacking the behaviour of officials in the European’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), pp. 495–514.
Week 4 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 7 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Debate 1: Decision-making in the EU: Democratic governance (A) or rule by technocrats (B)? – Moderator: Thomas Christiansen
Session 8 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
The European Commission (TC)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.5 The European Commission.
Bauer, M. and Becker, S. (2014) The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance, Journal of European Integration, 36:3,
Christiansen, T. (1997) ‘Tensions of European governance: politicized bureaucracy and multiple accountability in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), pp. 73–90.
Nugent, N. and Rhinard, M. (2016) ‘Is the European Commission Really in Decline ?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), pp. 1199–1215.
Week 5 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 9 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Debate 2: EU Decision-making: Consensual cooperation (A) or inter-state bargaining (B)? Moderator: Giulia Gallinella
Session 10 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
The Council of Ministers (TC)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chs.4 The Council of the EU, and 14 The Committee of Permanent Representatives.
Novak, S. (2013) ‘The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6).
Christiansen, T. and Vanhoonacker, S. (2008) ‘At a critical juncture? Change and continuity in the institutional development of the Council Secretariat’, West European Politics, 31(4), pp. 751–770.
Fouilleux, E., Maillard, J. De and Smith, A. (2005) ‘Technical or political? The working groups of the EU Council of Ministers’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), pp. 609–623.
Week 6 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 11 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Debate 3: Decision-making in the EU: Rule of Law (A) or Power Politics (B)? Moderator: Dora Hegedus
Session 12 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
The EU Court of Justice and Law Enforcement in the EU (GG)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chs.7 The Court of Justice, 10 The European Court of Auditors, and 12 The institutions of JHA.
Alter, K. (1998). Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty”?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization, 52(1), pp. 121-147
Mattli, W., & Slaughter, A. (1998). Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization, 52(1), 177-209
Aden, H., Sanchez-Barrueco, M.-L., & Stephenson, P. (2019). 'The European Public Prosecutor’s Office : strategies for coping with complexity', European Parliament, available online at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/621806/IPOL_STU(2019)621806_EN.pdf
Blauberger, M. (2009). 'Of “good” and “bad” subsidies: European state aid control through soft and hard law'. West European Politics, 32(4), pp. 719–737.
Week 7 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 13 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Debate 4: The Euro: success (A) or failure (B)? Moderator: Giulia Gallinella
01/11/2022 Bank holiday, no classes
Week 8 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 14 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Debate 5: Organised Interest Representation in the EU: valuable contribution (A) or undemocratic interference (B)? Moderator: Dora Hegedus
Session 15 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
Civil Society, Organised Interests and Scientific Experts in EU Decision-making (DH)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chs.8 The European Commission: cabinets and services and 16 The EESC and the CoR.
Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2008) ‘Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European union’, West European Politics. Routledge, 31(4), pp. 725–750.
Marshall, D. (2010) ‘Who to lobby and when: Institutional determinants of interest group strategies in European Parliament committees’, European Union Politics, 11(4), pp. 553–575. doi: 10.1177/1465116510382462.
Heidbreder, E.G. (2012) ‘Civil society participation in EU governance", Living Rev. Euro. Gov. 7, (2012), 2. URL: http://europeangovernance-livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2012-2
Week 9 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 16 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Debate 6: Should European political parties be entirely funded by the EU budget (A) or not (B)? Moderator: Dora Hegedus
Session 17 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
The Role of Political Parties in EU Decision-making (Guest Lecture by Udo Zolleis – Head of the Strategy Unit, EPP Group in the EP)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.15 European parties.
Tallberg, J. and Johansson, K. M. (2008) ‘Party politics in the European Council’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(8), pp. 1222–1242
Christiansen, T. (2016) ‘After the Spitzenkandidaten: fundamental change in the EU’s political system?’, West European Politics, 39(5), pp. 992–1010.
Marsh, M. and Mikhaylov, S. (2010), ‘European Parliament elections and EU governance’, Living Rev. Euro. Gov.5:4. URL: http://europeangovernance-livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2010-4
Hix, S. and Hoyland, B. (2011), Democracy, Parties, and Elections in The Political System of the European Union. London: Palgrave, pp. 130-145.
Week 10 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 18 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
Debate 7: EU Foreign Policy: Effective (A) or Futile (B)? Moderator: Giulia Gallinella
Session 19 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
The European External Action Service (TC)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.13 The institutions of the CFSP.
Juncos, A. E. and Pomorska, K. (2013) ‘“In the face of adversity”: explaining the attitudes of EEAS officials vis-à-vis the new service’, Journal of European Public Policy. Routledge, 20(9), pp. 1332–1349.
Wouters, P. J. and Duquet, S. (2011) ‘The EU, EEAS and Union Delegations and International Diplomatic Law: New Horizons?’ Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper No.62 Leuven. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1898664
Aggestam, L. and Johansson, M. (2017) ‘The Leadership Paradox in EU Foreign Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(6), pp. 1203–1220.
Amadio Viceré, M. G. (2016) ‘The roles of the President of the European Council and the High Representative in leading EU foreign policy on Kosovo’, Journal of European Integration. Routledge, 38(5), pp. 557–570.
Amadio Viceré, M.G., Tercovich, G. & Carta, C. (2020) The post-Lisbon high representatives: an introduction, European Security, 29:3, 259-274.
Koops, J.A. and Tercovich, G. (2020) ‘Shaping the European External Action Service and its post-Lisbon crisis management structures: an assessment of the EU High Representatives’ political leadership’, European Security, 29(3), pp. 275-300.
Week 11 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
Session 20 (online, 12.00 – 13.00)
The European Central Bank System (TC)
Hodson, D., & Peterson, J. (2021) Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.11 The institutions of the Economic and Monetary Union.
Fromage, D. and Ibrido, R. (2018) ‘The “Banking Dialogue” as a model to improve parliamentary involvement in the Monetary Dialogue?*’, Journal of European Integration., 40(3), pp. 295–308.
Hodson, D. (2013) ‘The Eurozone in 2012: “Whatever It Takes to Preserve the Euro’’?”’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(S1), pp. 183–200.
Torres, F. (2013) ‘The EMU’s Legitimacy and the ECB as a Strategic Political Player in the Crisis Context’, Journal of European Integration. Routledge, 35(3), pp. 287–300.
Mooij, A. M. (2022) ‘The Role of the European Central Bank in Response to Covid-19. An Evalation of its Mandate’, Journal of European Integration. Forthcoming.
Session 21 (in person, 12.30 – 14.30)
Final Discussion on the Future of Europe (and exam revision)
Week 12 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
First year Magistrale students have only 11 weeks of teaching during the first semester.