RESEARCH PROJECT DESIGN
Instructional goals
A central mission for universities is to conduct research that both advances a scientific discipline and enlightens practice in a professional domain. To make research not being a solitary exercise but instead a collective achievement it should be carefully designed and implemented.
Different research approach are available for social scientists: quantitative and qualitative research methods. For each of them there are different research tools that should be implemented.
The overall objective of this course is to present the main steps to develop a rigorous and relevant research for academics and managers.
Intended learning outcomes
Upon completion of the course, students will have developed the following knowledge and skills:
Knowledge and understanding:
Reading and interpretation of scientific papers and reports;
Understanding and knowledge of research methodology;
Ability to evaluate research done and to design a research project;
Ability to evaluate and discuss papers.
Applying knowledge and understanding:
Ability to apply the concepts taught in the course to the different research methodologies;
Ability to diagnose research methodology advantages and drawbacks.
Analytical capacity to implement statistical models to analyze data;
Design, interpret and carry out evidence-based research for decision making in businesses.
Communication skills:
Communication and interpretation skills, processing and synthesis of data relating to the problems under study;
Acquisition of the appropriate terminology;
Communicate evidence-based findings to different audiences.
Ability to learn (learning skills):
At the end of the course, the student will be equipped with the knowledge necessary to interpret and understand the various research methodologies and the structure of scientific papers and reports.
Course Contents
The course deals with the concept of engaged scholarship, evidencing the crucial step to develop a rigorous and relevant research: formulating the research problem and research question based on an accurate literature review and on the current empirical need; the need for theory building; the choice of the research design; how to collect data and how conduct empirical analyses; and how to communicate the outcomes.
Concerning the research design phase, students will be exposed to quantitative and qualitative methods with empirical application.
Reference Books
Andrew Van de Ven, J. 2011. Engaged Scholarship.
Slides
Teaching Methods
Frontal classes, scientific articles reading, case discussion, individual assignments, group work.
Assessment Method
For attending students:
• Individual assignment exercises (30% of the final grade)
• Group assignment (50%)
• Class participation (20%)
• Grade given from groupmates (bonus and malus applied)
Note: marks for group assignment and class participation cannot be rejected. In case of rejection of the individual assignment exercises, the student will have to take an exam.
For non-attending students:
• Individual assignment (70%)
• Exam 30%
Note: The individual assignment mark cannot be rejected.
In all the evaluation criteria it must be reached a sufficient grade, otherwise additional deliverables will be assigned to pass the exam.
Thesis assignment criteria
Chronological order. Approval subject to the evaluation of a structured abstract.
Week 1 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Course opening, presentation of the syllabus, project work deliverables and explanation of evaluation criteria
- Engaged research definition
Readings:
• Chapter 1, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
• Vermeulen F., “I shall not remain insignificant”: Adding a second loop to matter more, Academy of Management Journal, 2007
• Tushman M. and O’Reilly C., Statistical significance provide support for the hypotheses posited, Academy of Management Journal, 2007
Week 2 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Formulating the research problem and the research question
- Literature review: what is it and how to do it
Readings:
• Chapter 3, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
Week 3 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Theory building
- Research design
Readings:
• Chapter 4, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
• Chapter 5, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
Week 4 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Quantitative research
Readings:
• Chapter 6, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
Readings:
• Chapter 6, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
Week 5 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Quantitative research: descriptive statistics
- Experiment and t-test
Week 6 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Quantitative research: experiments and t-test
- Group presentation
Week 7 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Quantitative research: linear regression
- Group presentation
Week 8 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Quantitative research: linear regression
Week 9 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Qualitative research: introduction
- Qualitative research: Grounded Theory
Readings:
• Chapter 7, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
• Gioia D., Corley K., and Hamilton A., Seeking Qualitative Rigor in
Inductive Research: Notes on
the Gioia Methodology, Organizational Research Methods, 2012
- Qualitative research: Eisenhardt methodology
Readings:
• Eisenhardt K., Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Journal, 1989
• Eisenhardt K. and Graebner M., Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 2007
• Gehman J., Glaser V., Eisenhardt K., Gioia D., Langley A., and Corley K., Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building, Journal of Management Inquiry, 2018
Week 10 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Qualitative research: wrap up
- Ethics in research
Week 11 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- How to write discussion, contributions and conclusions
Readings:
• Chapter 8, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
• Chapter 9, in Van de Ven, A. 2011.
Week 12 Contenuto sessioni on line e on campus
- Crucial points for making a good research and a good paper/report.
- Course recap