Instructional goals
Provide students with fundamental knowledge of EU Law, also through the analysis of the most relevant case law and the current events. At the end of the course, students will be able to deeply understand the functioning of the EU legal order. Moreover, they will manage to comprehend the specificity and uniqueness of such legal system, which is on the border between international and constitutional law. It is a system which prevails over national laws and directs their evolution and development. Finally, students will be able to analyze and interpret current events thanks to their knowledges in the field of EU law
Prerequisites
Completion of the prerequisite exams Good knowledge of English
Intended learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding: Students will acquire a specific knowledge on the main issues of EU Law, such as the development of European integration, the institutions, competences, the EU legal order, the protection of human rights, the impact of EU law on national legal orders, state liability, law making and judicial proceedings. This goal will be achieved through both theoretical lectures and the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The acquisition of these skills will be tested during class discussions throughout the course and also in the final test (written or oral). Written test will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the classes and opted for it instead of oral examination. Oral examination is the only option for other students.
Applying knowledge and understanding: Students will be able to handle and apply the norms and principles of EU law, also when facing specific cases. Moreover, they will be able to identify the role played by such principles and norms in the process of European integration. The acquisition of these skills will be tested during class discussions throughout all the course and also in the final test (written or oral). Written test will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the classes and opted for it instead of oral examination. Oral examination is the only option for all other students.
Making judgments: Students will be able to understand and analyze in a critical way the European integration and the role played by the European Union in the management of the past and future challenges. In addition, the analysis of the ECJ case law will help the development of a critical thinking.
Communication skills: Students will learn an appropriate legal vocabulary and gain appropriate communication skills in the field of EU law. This will be achieved through the analysis of both legal sources and case law. The skills will be tested during class discussions and also in the final test (written or oral). Written test will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the classes and opted for it instead of oral examination. Oral examination is the only option for all other students.
Learning skills: Skills acquired during the course will allow students to understand and interpret autonomously the forthcoming legislation and case law in the EU legal order. Moreover, students will develop a strong knowledge of the key topics of EU law, which will help them to deepen their studies in this field and to undertake different professional paths after the completion of their studies.
Course Contents
1. Origins and development of European integration, including with regard to Brexit and the (legal) response to COVID-19
2. EU institutions
3. EU Membership, values and goals
4. EU competences, subsidiarity and proportionality
5. Primary law and secondary law
6. Decision making procedures
7. The impact of EU law over national legal order and judicial protection of rights before the national courts: consistent interpretation, primacy, direct effect and indirect effect
8. A focus on direct effect: the milestones
9. Revisiting direct effect, today
10. Controversial horizontal direct effect
11. State liability
12. Partial national procedural autonomy
13. An overview on the relationship between Italian and EU law
14. The judicial protection of rights before the CJEU: infringement proceedings and possible role of Court of Justice
15. Preliminary proceedings
16. Annulment proceedings
17. Failure to act
18. “Minor” competences of the CJEU
19. EU external action
20. An overview on EU substantive law and EU policies: citizenship, internal market, competition, area of freedom, security and justice, and economic and monetary policy.
21. Simulation of CJEU case
Reference Books
Students who have attended at least 80% of the classes, i.e., are “attending students” as stated in the list published on Luiss learn page, have to refer to the following:
1. The slides and class notes constitute the reference material for certain (small) parts of the course identified during class. In particular, these parts correspond to n. 1, 5, 7 and 20 of the list presented above.
Additionally, attending students must refer to:
2. R. Schütze, European Union Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 2021, limited to pages 73–149; 227–286; 291–304; 314–338; 357–438; 451–470; 888–903, and
3. D. Gallo, Direct Effect in EU Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2025, limited to pages 1–246.
The list of “attending students” will be published a week after the end of the classes.
For “other students”, i.e., students who did not attended at least 80% of the class and, therefore, are not in the mentioned list, please refer to:
1. R. Schütze, European Union Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 2021, limited to pages 3–41; 73–149; 227–286; 291–304; 314–338; 357–438; 451–470; 888–903.
2. D. Gallo, Direct Effect in EU Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2025.
Please note that any references to legislation and case law analyzed during the lectures will be published online on the official LUISS Learn page of the course.
Teaching Methods
The teaching method will consist of frontal teaching, including lectures given by Professor Daniele Gallo, visiting Professor Paul Dermine from the Université Libre de Bruxelles, teaching assistants, and representatives from Italian and European institutions, including judicial bodies. Some classes will involve group work and collective analyses of current issues in EU law.
Assessment Method
The final exam consists either in a written or in an oral test. The former will be held in the first examination session and is reserved to those who attended at least 80% of the course and opted for it instead of oral examination.
The written test will last 3 hours and will be composed of 14 multiple- choice questions, 3 open questions and 1 case study. The grade is expressed in thirtieths.
The final evaluation is made by adding the scores obtained, on the basis of the answers given to the questions of the test: the correct answer to each multiple-choice question gives a score equal to 1 (if no answer is given, or if the answer is incorrect, for that question no score will be awarded); to each answer to an open question or relating to a case study will be given a score from 0 to 5 according to the following criteria, based on the level of preparation shown: insufficient (0 points); sufficient (1 point); quite good (2 points); good (3 points); very good (4 points); excellent (5 points).
The failure to achieve at least the score of 18/30 will result in failure to pass the exam.
Correct answers to all multiple-choice questions and an excellent level of preparation in all open questions as well as in the examination of the case study result in a score of 30/30 cum laude.
In the open questions – for the purposes of awarding a score from 0 to 5 according to the above indications –, to assess the level of preparation of the student, the following evaluation criteria will be jointly taken into account: knowledge and understanding of the notions and principles of the matter and ability to apply them to concrete cases; appropriate use of the technical and legal vocabulary, ability to analyse and evaluate relevant sources and acquisition of the method of analysis.
2) The oral exam is the only option for all other students (i.e. did not attend at least 80% o classes or have not decided to take the written test).
Both in the written and oral test, students will be required to show that they know and understand notions and principles of EU Law and that they are able to apply them to practical cases. Student are expected to be able to autonomously analyze sources and relevant theories of EU Law and to use the appropriate technical and legal vocabulary, thus proving that they have acquired the study method and the learning ability for carrying on, also autonomously, further study of the matter.
The following evaluation criteria will be taken into account to assign the final grade, expressed in thirtieths: knowledge and both theoretical and practical understanding of the notions and principles of the matter (65%); appropriate use of the technical and legal vocabulary, ability to analyze and evaluate relevant sources and acquisition of the study method (35%).
Gaps concerning one or more notions or principles will lead to an insufficient evaluation, even in presence of a basic knowledge of the matter.
Thesis assignment criteria
Positive outcome of the exam, interest in a critical understanding of the subject, good skills in bibliographical and case-law research, adequate knowledge of English (and possibly one more language amongst French, Spanish or German).
Week 1
1. Origins and development of European integration, including with regard to Brexit and the (legal) response to COVID-19
i. Definition of EU and differences between EU, Europe and Council of Europe
ii. Why was the EU created?
iii. Supranationality, autonomy and originality of EU law
iv. Institutional law and substantive law: two sides of a coin
v. Ventotene Manifesto, Schuman declaration, ECSC, Messina Conference, Spaak Committee, EURATOM, EEC
vi. Examples of EU originality: Van Gend, Costa e Kadi
vii. Enlargement
viii. Single European Act
ix. Maastricht Treaty
x. Amsterdam Treaty
xi. Nice Treaty and the Charter of fundamental rights
xii. Constitutional Treaty
xiii. Lisbon Treaty
xiv. Brexit
xv. Response to COVID 19
Week 2
2. EU institutions
i. Commission
ii. Council
iii. European Council
iv. European parliament
Week 3
FOLLOW:
v. Court of justice
vi. European Investment Bank
vii. Court of auditors
viii. High representative for common and foreign security policy
ix. Consulting bodies
x. Agencies
Week 4
3. EU Membership, values and goals
i. Accession
ii. Values and goal
iii. WIthdrawal
iv. Differentiated integration and enhanced cooperation
4. EU competences, subsidiarity and proportionality
i. Principle of conferral
ii. Competences
iii. Exclusive competence
iv. Shared competence
v. Competence to support, coordinate and complement States’ action
vi. Flexibility clause
vii. Preemption
viii. Subsidiarity and proportionality
Week 5
5. Primary law and secondary law
i. Treaties
ii. General principles and fundamental rights
iii. Charter of fundamental rights
iv. International law
v. Binding legal acts (both legislative and non-legislative): regulations, directives and decisions
vi. Other non-legislative legal acts: in particular, delegated and implementing acts
vii. Non-binding legal acts: in particular recommendations and opinions
viii. Atypical acts and soft law
ix. CFSP acts
x. Interinstitutional agreements
6. Decision making procedures
i. Legal basis and role of the EU institutions
ii. Ordinary legislative procedure
iii. Special legislative procedure
iv. Consultation and consent procedure
v. Procedure for the adoption of delegated acts
vi. Procedure for the adoption of implementing acts
7. The impact of EU law over national legal order and judicial protection of rights before the national courts: consistent interpretation, primacy, direct effect and indirect effect
i. Primacy
ii. Consistent interpreation
iii. Direct effect
Week 6
8. A focus on direct effect: the milestones
i. Sources of EU law and domestic effectiveness
ii. Content of direct effect
iii. Direct effect implications
Week 7
9. Revisiting direct effect, today
i. The test
ii. The relationship between direct effect and direct applicability
iii. Duty to disapply vs faculty to disapply
iv. The 'true' constituents of direct effect and the problem of the reversed vertical effect
v. Physiological and pathological exceptions to the disapplication obligation
10. Controversial horizontal direct effect
i. Treaty Rules
ii. Directives
iii. Fundamental rights
iv. Decisions
Week 8
11. State liability
i. Court of Justice of the European Union and General Court
ii. Procedure before the Court of Justice
iii. Individualize procedure before the Court of Justice and national courts
12. Partial national procedure autonomy
i. Articols 227 e 228 TFEU
13. An overview on the relationship between Italian and EU law
i. Costa
ii. Frontini and ICIC
iii. Simmenthal and Granital
iv. Article 117 Const.
v. Decision 269/2017 and subsequent case law, including judgment 181/2024
vi. Taricco Saga
vii. Seaside concessions
Week 9
14. The judicial protection of rights before the CJEU: infringement proceedings and possible role of Court of Justice
i. Commission vs. State and State vs. State
ii. Pre-litigation phase
iii. Litigation phase
iv. EU court judgments
Week 10
1. Preliminary proceedings
I Ratio, importance, features and limits
II Notion of national court or tribunal
III Right and duty to refer
IV Preliminary ruling on interpretation
V Preliminary ruling on validity
VI Admissibility and relevance
VII Effects of the judgement
2. Annulment proceedings
I. Locus standi
II. Failures
III. Judgement and effects
Week 11
17. Action for failure to act
i. Locus standi
ii. Grounds for Deficiency
iii. Judgment and Effects
18. “Minor” competences of the Court of Justice
i. Identification of jurisdiction
ii. In particular: labour disputes
iii. In particular: advisory function
19. EU external action
i. Origins
ii. CFSP
iii. Art. 21 and 22 TEU
iv. Articles 215 and 216-218 TFEU
v. Common defense policy
vi. Common commercial policy
vii. Cooperation and association
Week 12
20. An overview on EU substantive law and EU policies: in particular, internal market, citizenship, area of freedom security and justice, economic and monetary policy
i. Definition of substantive law and EU policies
ii. EU citizenship: beyond the market
iii. Freedoms of movement
iv. Competition law
v. Area of Freedom Security and Justice: migration and humanitarian protection
vi. Economic and monetary policy
21. Simulation of a court case