LEGAL METHODOLOGY

LEGAL METHODOLOGY

Angelo Abignente, Fabio Ciaramelli

Instructional goals

Through reflection on the foundation of the constituent elements of legal science and the examination of the main methods of reasoning and argumentation of the jurist, the course aims to provide students with the conceptual apparatus, critical awareness and basic vocabulary for the study of positive law and legal practice. The teaching aims, in fact, to promote the ability to apply theoretical knowledge to concrete situations, relevant both in reference to the traditional legal professions and corporate lawyers and for the professionalism of the public administration.

Intended learning outcomes

1.Knowledge and understanding: The student - by participating in the lectures and practical activities of the course - will have acquired full knowledge of the general categories of legal science and the theory of legal argumentation (rules and principles, weighting, subsumption), also in the light of the analysis and assessment of case law. 2. Applying knowledge and understanding: The student - acquiring the correct tools and method - will be able to interpret and apply the principles and techniques of interpretation and legal reasoning. The occurence of online content in the digital platform of the course and the holding of practical workshops will permite to verify in real time the skills acquired by students. 3. Making judgements: The student, through the use of the legal categories acquired during the course, will be able to collect data and materials through the acquisition of a legal method that will be the basis for dealing with the entire course of study. This will allow it to acquire the ability to independently assess the sources of law and the jurisprudential guidelines formulating its critical judgment on the application of them to specific cases, identifying the appropriate solutions to the practical cases submitted to your attention. 4. Communication skills: At the end of the course the student will be able to master, with appropriate terminological precision, the technical-legal lexicon of the methodology of legal science. By participating in the different activities of the course - lessons with classroom discussions, oral exams, simulated process, written tests, laboratories - the student will learn to put into practice such communicative skills in different contexts, thus acquiring additional rhetorical and argumentative skills, indispensable for their professional path. 5. Learning skills The technical-legal categories learned during the course will allow the student to acquire a solid knowledge of the tools of legal reasoning. The acquisition and the mastery in the use of the interpretative and argumentative techniques will allow him to continue to deepen also in autonomy the topics addressed and to undertake the different paths of professional training post lauream

Course Contents

Juridical methodology and principal conceptions of juridical science. Logic structure and methodological tools of legal reasoning Juridical hermeneutics and theory of argumentation.

Reference Books

M. Atienza, Diritto come argomentazione. Concezioni dell'argomentazione, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2012 (pp. 1-107) A. Abignente, L’argomentazione giuridica nell’età dell’incertezza, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2017 F. Ciaramelli, L’ordine simbolico della legge e il problema del metodo, Giappichelli, Torino 2021.

Teaching Methods

Frontal lessons; Analysis and evaluation of case law with practical exercises of the students; reading and comparison with a text chosen by a classic of the right-philosophical thought; group discussions, simulated process.

Assessment Method

Oral examination. During the oral exam the student will be required to show that he/she knows and understands the legal philosophy and legal argumentation theories. The student is expected to be able to independently analyse sources and relevant theories of philosophy and legal law and to use the appropriate technical and legal vocabulary, thus proving that he/she has acquired the study method and the learning ability for carrying on, also independently, further study of the matter. The following evaluation criteria will be taken into account to assign the final grade, expressed in thirtieths: - knowledge and understanding of the notions and principles of the matter and ability to apply them to concrete cases; appropriate use of the technical and legal vocabulary, ability to analyse and evaluate relevant sources and acquisition of the study method. Learning gaps concerning one or more notions or principles will lead to an insufficient evaluation, even in presence of a basic knowledge of the matter.

Thesis assignment criteria

You must have taken the Methodology of Legal Science exam with a vote not less than 24/30 and the ability to read correctly texts in one of the following languages: English, French, Spanish, German.

Week 1

Session 1/On-campus: The natural law theory. The birth of natural law in Ancient Greece Session 2/On campus: The natural law theory in Ancient Greek philosophy Session 1/On-line: Plato and Aristoteles

Week 2

Session 1/On-campus: Natural law in Ancient Roman legal thinking Session 1/On campus: Natural law theory in Middle Ages Session 1/On campus: Natural law theory in Modern Ages

Week 3

Session 1/On-campus: The Natural law theories in the 18th Century Session 2/On campus: The legal positivism Session 1/On line: Philosophical positivism and legal positivism

Week 4

Session 1/On-campus: Theory of Codification Session 2/On campus: English Utilitarianism Session 1/On campus: Development of German legal positivism (interactive discussion)

Week 5

Session 1/On-campus: Hans Kelsen and legal positivism Session 2/On campus: Hans Kelsen and the normative theory of law Session 1/On line: Hans Kelsen and the normative theory of law (interactive discussion)

Week 6

Session 1/On-campus: The legal system and the norms Session 2/On campus: Legal reasoning Logic and Rhetoric Session 1/On campus: The effectiveness of the legal system (interactive discussion)

Week 7

Session 1/On-campus: Pre-term written examination Session 2/On-campus: Inductive and deductive reasoning Session 1/On-line: Theories of legal antiformalism

Week 8

Session 1/On-campus: American legal realism Session 2/On campus: Quaestio facti and quaestio iuris Session 1/On campus: Scandinavian legal realism

Week 9

Session 1/On-campus: Law and ethical valus: the constitutional theory of law Session 2/On campus: The logic of the judgement Session 2/On campus: Equality and dignity

Week 10

Session 1/On-campus: Law and facts: neo-institutional theory of law Session 2/On campus: The legacy of legal realism: Critical legal studies and feminist theories of law Session 1/On line: Economic analysis of law

Week 11

Session 1/On-line: Legal reasoning Session 2/On campus: Law and Hermeneutics Session 1/On line: New frontiers in legal philosophy: multiculturalism

Week 12

Session 1/On-line: New frontiers in legal philosophy: law, science and technology Session 2/On campus: Pre-term written examination Session 1/On line: Environmental Legal philosophy